Originally posted by: blue-ice.1
I don't see anything wrong in what she said....First of all she did not say that Ranbir is not or is a Joru ka gulaam...she was talking in general....unless there is something more...I am basing off what you have posted.
I agree JKG is not a nice thing to say but then you have to remember she is from a different generation which is not as savvy or smart spoken as our current batch of actresses...or our feminists of today....when it comes to older actors and actresses....u will have to excuse their language.....😆Every generation has their own lingo to describe things....u might cringe at theirs's but trust me they might cringe at yours's
Hypothetically ...even if she was speaking about Ranbir because he is newly married these questions are asked....her answer was correct to the T.....a balance is necessary....whether its being Mama's boy or JKG😆
A adult child is entitled to live his own life. Doesn't mean he should forget his parents. But if his wife makes the decisions in the house, it's not the mother's place to interfere as long as 2 consenting adults are involved.
Generation might be diff, but toxic is toxic. And its not about feminism though the anger gets directed to daughters in law. It's about parents needing to understand their control ends when the child becomes an adult.
And if a son is not paying attention to mom, it doesn't automatically follow that the daughter in law is keeping him prisoner and not letting him associate with his parents. Perhaps the son is thoughtless and irresponsible. Why blame the wife for an adult man's mistakes? He's responsible for it. It's not a woman's responsibility to fix her adult male partner's bad behavior.
(I get that Neetu said it's the man's fault. But she also uses JkG, which squarely places the blame on the daughter in law)
Edited by HearMeRoar - 3 years ago
25