Originally posted by: Scarlet.ferro
I don't even live in India. Never understood the hype it has 🤣 trust me I don't care if he was there or not.. better if latter 😆
Anyway. You are right. May be I phrased it wrong. He had validation and recognition in public. Definately did and hence the massive emotional outburst on his demise. I was talking about unfair treatment and lack of recognition on bollywood's behalf which noone can deny.
Lack of recognition by whom? Just KJO and Gang and YRF? Are they equivalent to whole Bollywood? Sushant worked with top production houses like Fox, Balaji, UTV, Sajid Nadiadwala, T-Series etc, he worked with acclaimed directors like Neeraj Pandey, Dibakar Bannerjee, Nitesh Tiwari, he worked with prominent actresses, apparently SLB offered him Ram Leela, Oscar nominated Shekhar Kappoor took him in Pani. Clearly all these people recognized his talent and considered him worthy. All his Co-Stars have spoken highly of him. So I ask again who ignored him and did not recognize his talent? Most people seem to site KJO not inviting him for KWK, not inviting him for parties, the so called "nepo gang" not praising him as examples of his "unfair treatment". Is their validation so important when clearly there were others who have appreciated him.
I am not saying SSR has faced no discrimination. He probably struggled a lot to make his place in this big bad industry. I am sure he came across biased, unfair people and practices. What I am taking about is a blanket statement being passed around that "Bollywood" was unfair to him and did not recognize him.
Despite nomination, kai Po che didn't get him 'highly acclaimed awards'.
If dhoni's success was solely on mahi's craze (a huge fan , bdw) then vivek Oberoi's pm biopic or whatever that was should have been a blockbuster!!
The Vivek Oberoi film was literally a B-Grade movie and from the promos itself looked like a propaganda film. I don't think anyone considered that as an actual biopic of Modi. The movie still has to be entertaining and well made for people to watch it. I am sure if a proper biopic was ever made the results would be different. I am not singling out SSR. The nature of biopics is such that one of the main USPs of the movies is their actual subject matter. I would say the same about Sanju. Ranbir was brilliant, but I am sure a lot of people went to see it out of curiosity about Sanjay Dutt's life. Tomorrow if someone made a biopic on Trump or Obama, don't you think people's interest in these people would have a huge bearing on the success of the films?
Star screen was the only award he had ever received in his entire career. If not all but many will agree that he deserved more. But again, the awards are anyway rigged and again we have come full circle . Chalo fine they didn't fine him worthy enough for a Filmfare , but suraj Pancholi? Seriously?
I agree Irrfan khan deserved the Filmfare best actor but if sara coulld win the award, Sushant certainly deserved a nomination.
Chicchore was a brilliant movie. I don't remember any award that was given to him on that. Chalo leave that too.
Bhumi got nominated for Sonchiraiya . Why wasn't Sushant nominated then? They could have given all of the awards to gully boy for all I cared but he did deserve a nomination.
This does not mean he wasn't successful. Success doesn't really have anything to do with rigged awards. But to not even put him in nomination despite being worthy of it is what I am talking about.
We all need validation and recognition from our workplace irrespective of countless appreciation from others. Everyone kept saying he was above all this and he didn't care about it but at the end , he was human.
I think we both agree that Bollywood award shows are a sham. So many actors have spoken about how they don't really value the awards because it is ultimately given based on who attends the awards or who pays the most for it. Very rarely has the most deserving person ever won. Even then who is to say who is most deserving? I might feel Amitabh deserved it, you may feel Sushant deserved it, someone else may feel Ranveer deserved it. Art is subjective so there is no right answer to who is the most deserving. Sushant was nominated for 3 of his most critically acclaimed films, which means his performance was recognized as being among the top 4-5 performances of the year.
Yes Nitesh Tiwari chose Sushant on his talent but the movie was marketed as Dangal director's second movie!! I have myself read it in so many articles.
How many times have you seen this happening? Was dear zindagi called a gauri shinde movie or SRK movie?
I guess it depends on the director and how acclaimed he is? Highway was marketed as an Imtiaz Ali fim, student of the year was marketed as a Karan Johar film, Rajkumar Hirani, SLB, Anurag Kashyap, Zoya Akhtar are all examples of directors who get top billing in the marketing of their films almost as much as the leading actors. When these directors release films media does talk about Karan Johar's new film or SLBs new film etc.
Why are there only handful of articles (if any) that praised Sushant as an actor and plathora of those that defamed him?
Most articles praising an actor is the work of their own PR. I would blame Sushant's PR for this. They should have been more aggressive in promoting the critical acclaims that he got, and making sure there are enough positive articles out there about him. That's precisely what these PR firms are hired to do and if they din't do that well then I say they failed him.