SLB claims he had to replace SSR in 4 movies due to dates - Page 2

Originally posted by: zehreeli.kheer

Half girlfriend wasn't snatched from him though.. he let go of it for Raabta because the dates were clashing

Is it? See this is how news flies from gossip to gossip and then eventually becomes the gospel truth.....SSR is not the first one to become a victim of this and I am sure neither will he be the last one!

Which 4 film ?

I doubt he wanted to take ssr in bajirao after ranveer gave him what he wanted during ram leela production

Originally posted by: cricketfan1

Is it? See this is how news flies from gossip to gossip and then eventually becomes the gospel truth.....SSR is not the first one to become a victim of this and I am sure neither will he be the last one!

I remember him letting go of HF was cited as a reason of Ekta being miffed with him back in the day.. also he had stated he had to let go of the movie due to date issues

OT, I don't think SLB has even done four films post his comeback after the Guzaarish debacle

Just change the name from Ranveer to Ranbir. And the narrative will take a complete u turn. All the blinds and rumours about him are gospel truth which everyone should beileve. But not when it is ranveer. Acha hai 😆

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

Just change the name from Ranveer to Ranbir. And the narrative will take a complete u turn. All the blinds and rumours about him are gospel truth which everyone should beileve. But not when it is ranveer. Acha hai 😆

Why do you say so? I am one of the members here questioning the source...Have you ever seen me saying the blinds about Ranbir were gospel truth? And sin’t this about SLB?

Originally posted by: cricketfan1

Why do you say so? I am one of the members here questioning the source...Have you ever seen me saying the blinds about Ranbir were gospel truth? And sin’t this about SLB?

I am not talking about you. I was talking in general that had it been about ranbir nobody would have spared a minute to think how faulty the article sounds on so many levels. Everyone would have pounced at him and thread would have crossed 20 pages by now.

Having said that i do believe that maybe not 4 but atleast one of the films was originally offered to Sushant. And he didn't declined. Slb replaced him.

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

I am not talking about you. I was talking in general that had it been about ranbir nobody would have spared a minute to think how faulty the article sounds on so many levels. Everyone would have pounced at him and thread would have crossed 20 pages by now.

Having said that i do believe that maybe not 4 but atleast one of the films was originally offered to Sushant. And he didn't declined. Slb replaced him.

Whether its Ranbir or Ranveer or any XYZ, I have learned that as members here we have to question the source...Not that I have ever believed in them before but I always used to do my thing and ignore these things...But after seeing how it could affect someone so badly, I just wanted to do my bit trying to be more educated about how these things work....Of course, not that I can sit here all the time and post in every topic....:)

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

I am not talking about you. I was talking in general that had it been about ranbir nobody would have spared a minute to think how faulty the article sounds on so many levels. Everyone would have pounced at him and thread would have crossed 20 pages by now.

Having said that i do believe that maybe not 4 but atleast one of the films was originally offered to Sushant. And he didn't declined. Slb replaced him.

I really don't think slb replaced sushant, rs only had two films released when slb offered him ramleela, so there was no reason to replace sushant with ranveer, coz ranveer wasn't a big star at that time. It is most likely due to sushant not being able to sign a slb film coz he had date issues or was committed to another film, so slb offered the movie to someone else, this is a common thing in bollywood where people are not able to do a film and so it is offered to someone else

And highly doubt sushant was offered bajirao and padmavat, maybe slb offered him films that he was going to produce rather than direct

Originally posted by: cricketfan1

Whether its Ranbir or Ranveer or any XYZ, I have learned that as members here we have to question the source...Not that I have ever believed in them before but I always used to do my thing and ignore these things...But after seeing how it could affect someone so badly, I just wanted to do my bit trying to be more educated about how these things work....Of course, not that I can sit here all the time and post in every topic....:)

I am glad more people are being aware of this. I appreciate it. I really do.