Originally posted by: AllThatCritique
Abhishek is the son of the person who is considered as arguably the greatest actor of Hindi cinema and one of the greatest in the world. Completely different from Kareena's case. Nothing Kareena did was compared to a previous generation. Only to Karishma and Kareena was the better actor and far more beautiful than her sister so the comparison did no harm. Even Ranbir wasn't compared all that much to his father cause his father had lost much of the Kapoor ground back then. He was mildly compared to his grandfather who wasn't alive.
I'm just countering the notion that Kareena is relevant due to her surname. As you said, her lineage is strong but she had no precedents in the previous generation. So her success has nothing to do with her surname.
My point is: surname alone cannot make you survive. You need to have strong box-office pull and/or stardom. The surname can only get you a certain amount of goodwill and connections, but someone like Katrina and Priyanka have shown that you can make it big without those as well. The current example is Taapsee, who apart from Kangana, has the strongest lineup.
15