‘Saaho’ in the time of ‘Me Too’: (SPOILERS WARNING) - Page 3

Originally posted by: Charaiveti

attraction doesn't mean objectification or harrasment though. What's written in the article I as a woman will count as harassment specially at workplace.

Also if we go by primal evolutionary behaviours, monogamy doesn't make any sense either n except humans very very few species have it n they're not even that strict about it. Also in animal world Killing kids of other males n their kids to stop their genes from passing on is done too,ab woh vi Kare Kya. There's nothing wrong in getting attracted to someone who's goodlooking , but passing comments wagera not cool. We're not primal animals , there's a reason we HV been to space while the other species can't even drive

article ne situation waise hi manipulate Kiya hai, jaise Sahoo ne manipulate kiya Amu ko.

That scene was Saaho manipulating Amu, by praising her and trying to get inside her head, so he can distract her and make her in his full control so he can use it for his benefit.

But Khair chorro, aaj kal sab kuch harassment ban jata hai.

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader

article ne situation waise hi manipulate Kiya hai, jaise Sahoo ne manipulate kiya Amu ko.

That scene was Saaho manipulating Amu, by praising her and trying to get inside her head, so he can distract her and make her in his full control so he can use it for his benefit.

But Khair chorro, aaj kal sab kuch harassment ban jata hai.

Anyways I won't pass any comments again cz u r saying it's manipulated in the article. Which makes me think 50 was shown as 100 ,but not that 0 was shown as 100. Anyways,I won't watch the film so let's leave it here