Talent is irrelevant in Bollywood , do you agree - Page 3

Originally posted by: ThunderLight

When people with no looks, dance, dialogue delivery, body, stardom or even BASIC Professionalism/ Civilized behavior can get films after films despite washouts after washouts - then any XYZ starkid can get films.

So you do agree that talent is irrelevant in Bollywood. I too have the same opinion only my example is different but however I am glad that we atleast can agree to the topic of discussion. This isn't about nepotism or star kids, this is about talent relevance in the film industry.

Originally posted by: tina59

So you do agree that talent is irrelevant in Bollywood. I too have the same opinion only my example is different but however I am glad that we atleast can agree to the topic of discussion. This isn't about nepotism or star kids, this is about talent relevance in the film industry.

This is my full comment. U replied before i finished it 😆

When people with no looks, dance, dialogue delivery, body, stardom or even BASIC Professionalism/ Civilized behavior can get films after films despite washouts after washouts - then any XYZ starkid can get films. Kangoli jaisi ghatiya log ko koi naukrani ya chapraasi ka kaam se bhi nikal dega - jab usko films de rahe hai toh kisi bhi Sara, Ananya, Ranbir ko kyun nahi de sakte

Originally posted by: tina59

fair enough, so I have edited the topic and the title, can we now have a rational discussion on this?

what are your thoughts on this statement?

Wait .. What ? ..

Did you actually edit out Kangana's interview from the OP just because you cant bear to see that psycho being called out ? .. 😆

So, according to you "anything against Kangana" is not equal to "rational discussion" ? .. 😆

Originally posted by: ThunderLight

This is my full comment. U replied before i finished it 😆

When people with no looks, dance, dialogue delivery, body, stardom or even BASIC Professionalism/ Civilized behavior can get films after films despite washouts after washouts - then any XYZ starkid can get films. Kangoli jaisi ghatiya log ko koi naukrani ya chapraasi ka kaam se bhi nikal dega - jab usko films de rahe hai toh kisi bhi Sara, Ananya, Ranbir ko kyun nahi de sakte

good one so you do agree that talent is irrelevant again?

bcoz as per you, if KR and her sister being so " worthless , spineless, classless, talentless, shameless" can get movies then obviously the RK's and ananya's deserve it more . so again, you believe the that talent is irrelevant and I agree with it. Talent is irrelevant in Bollywood .

doesn't matter whose example you give

Originally posted by: --Pro.vo.King--

Wait .. What ? ..

Did you actually edit out Kangana's interview from the OP just because you cant bear to see that psycho being called out ? .. 😆

So, according to you "anything against Kangana" is not equal to "rational discussion" ? .. 😆

No coz if you read my first line of the post, I clearly said, do you agree with the statement, instead we had posts after posts on why she said the statement and whether she is credible to make that statement.

That is not what i asked,

again genuinely would love to know your thoughts on this, do you feel talent is irrelevant in Bollywood

Originally posted by: tina59

good one so you do agree that talent is irrelevant again?

bcoz as per you, if KR and her sister being so " worthless , spineless, classless, talentless, shameless" can get movies then obviously the RK's and ananya's deserve it more . so again, you believe the that talent is irrelevant and I agree with it. Talent is irrelevant in Bollywood .

doesn't matter whose example you give

I have to give Kangoli example bcoz she shud be last person to make such a statement. Unless, she went into a self realization 🤣

Originally posted by: ThunderLight

I have to give Kangoli example bcoz she shud be last person to make such a statement. Unless, she went into a self realization 🤣

Ok assume I am making the statement

"Talent is irrelevant in Bollywood", do you agree with my statement.

Now can we move on from who made it to do you agree with the statement

Originally posted by: tina59

Ok assume I am making the statement

"Talent is irrelevant in Bollywood", do you agree with my statement.

Now can we move on from who made it to do you agree with the statement

Are u constantly replying to me just to keep this topic active 🤣

Originally posted by: ThunderLight

Are u constantly replying to me just to keep this topic active 🤣

Actually I feel its the other way around, coz the moment I post anything on KR, you are there, its like I can summon you anytime from thin air coz I know exactly what makes you reply.😉....

anyway sorry if you feel that way, and no I am not I just want to know your thoughts but you cannot seem to look beyond KR or my being pro-KR...

Originally posted by: tina59

No coz if you read my first line of the post, I clearly said, do you agree with the statement, instead we had posts after posts on why she said the statement and whether she is credible to make that statement.

That is not what i asked,

again genuinely would love to know your thoughts on this, do you feel talent is irrelevant in Bollywood

But if you post a quote from an actor's interview , isn't it a given that the actor will be called out if he/she is being a hypocrite ? ..

You cant "demand" that members shouldn't discuss the actor in question and stick to what you expect from them .. Thats just absurd and wishful thinking .. Highly unreasonable ..

To answer your question - yes i do believe talent is relevant , not just in bolywood but every other field .. But more than talent , what really works wonders is hardwork and the way you conduct yourself .. Things like luck/destiny do play a part in the background (if you really believe in that sort of thing ) ..