Which actress career would've affected if Divya Bharti was alive?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Poll

Vote

Frequent Posters

astha36

@astha36

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: Ranjali
Madhuri because HAHK would have gone to divya.

She was supposed to do mohra, so instead of raveena she would have been in tip tip barsa pani.

Even Kajols career would have got affected as Divya and Shah Rukh made a better pair.

She couldn't have done a good job in Tip tip. Raveena is so hot in that song. Raveena would've done something else to showcase her sensual personality, I don't think they would be vying for the same kind of roles.

Quote

grounder

@grounder

Rocker

Posted: 8 years ago

#12

OMG .. seriously? .. this is a topic of discussion and poll here?

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

1115886

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: NadanParindey
Lol. People are really voting for Madhuri? She was already the reigning queen of BW by then.

And Kajol's career wouldn't have affected at all. Also, Divya Bharti was a poor actress. Most probably Raveena!

No votes for Juhi so far? Not surprised at all since this forum worships her. 🥱

Even Madhuri was big star at that time but if Divya kept doing well, then she would probably take Madhuri's place because by looking at Divya's filmography, it looks like she would be the next Sridevi, her movies in BW were only released in 1992-1993 and within 2 years, she had 13 movies released during that time and most of them were hit and superhit which was incredible, even actors at that time couldn't get that much of success like that, so Madhuri's number one position would've probably affected because if a newcomer suddenly does very well, then senior actress career can be affected, look at Rani and Preity, they were big star when DP and Kat entered in BW but as soon as DP and Kat started to rise, both Rani and Preity's career started to sink, so same situation could've happen in here if Divya was alive. Kajol's career would probably affected too because she replaced Divya in DDLJ and Hulchul which Divya was the first choice of these movies and DDLJ made Kajol a big star, if Divya was alive, then Kajol would probably not get the opportunity to create her chemistry with SRK because more producers and directors would cast SRK and Divya on more movies after DDLJ's success.

Edited by rim683 - 8 years ago

Quote

1125310

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

#14

People really think that Madz's career would've been affected? Hilarious to say the least.

Quote

Sree

@Katyayani_devi

Trailblazer

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#15

may be already established madhuri's career would ve been affected n tough competition might be there for rat race no1 spot

Quote

blue-ice.

@blue-ice.

Achiever

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#16

none of them...the shelf life of the actresses is short and that is why their is always difficult to find good actresses...so I don't think it would have mattered...but Divya was such a sweet girl...such a precious life wasted😒

Quote

1101232

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: blue-ice.
none of them...the shelf life of the actresses is short and that is why their is always difficult to find good actresses...so I don't think it would have mattered...but Divya was such a sweet girl...such a precious life wasted😒

BI... 🤗 😳

Kaha thi ap itne dino se? how have you been?

Quote

blue-ice.

@blue-ice.

Achiever

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#18

Originally posted by: NadanParindey

BI... 🤗 😳

Kaha thi ap itne dino se? how have you been?

NP🤗

just gotten really busy with work...zeher khaane ki fursat bhi nahi hoti on weekdays...i try to come here on weekends when i have time.

Quote

Rekha_ji

@Rekha_ji

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: astha36
I don't think they [Divya and Raveena] would be vying for the same kind of roles.

They starred together in Kshatriya (1993) - in which they played basically the same role of "love interest". They were also both signed for Parampara (1993) - again playing basically the same role.

Raveena replaced her in Mohra. Divya was also set to do Darr, which was also offered to Raveena.

So it's CLEAR they were vying for the same roles.

In the early 90s all the young actresses were interchangeable and all fighting over the same roles. Whether Kajol or Karisma or Pooja or Divya or Raveena or Ayesha or Tabu or Manisha or Urmila.

All pretty much playing the young virgin college girl thing. Only 3-4 years into their careers in mid-90s did they get a chance to really act.

Quote

Rekha_ji

@Rekha_ji

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#20

Originally posted by: rim683
Even Madhuri was big star at that time but if Divya kept doing well, then she would probably take Madhuri's place because by looking at Divya's filmography, it looks like she would be the next Sridevi, her movies in BW were only released in 1992-1993 and within 2 years, she had 13 movies released during that time and most of them were hit and superhit which was incredible

This is not true. Only Deewana and Shola Aur Shabnam were hits. The rest were either flops or average. But she was appreciated highly in films like Dil Ka Kya Kasoor and Dil Aashna Hai. As well as becoming a super star with Saat Samundar - but those films were not hits.

Even Sridevi barely had 2 or 3 hits in the entire 90s decade. She has the poorest hit:flop ratio. 😉

Edited by Rekha_ji - 8 years ago