SIMRAN | Reviews and Box Office | Hansal's Highest Grosser - Page 31

Originally posted by: Mimi_

are the makers complaining? The only person who has been complaining from way before the film released is Apurva. Not many media outlets paid attention to him before, but now that the film failed it seems like they're latching on to his previous interviews and publicizing them.

Originally posted by: ~*sindhu*~

@Nova19 Investment and business doesn't mean u become helpless. Then no business would have sruvived when workers rebelled. There are laws and contracts that safeguard everyone's interest and the makers failed or rather willingly ignored using them when the need arised.If they were scared of her vindictive nature I guess they would still be quiet and bear the loss and criticism silently rather than lashing out at her now.

Originally posted by: Mimi_

are the makers complaining? The only person who has been complaining from way before the film released is Apurva. Not many media outlets paid attention to him before, but now that the film failed it seems like they're latching on to his previous interviews and publicizing them.

Originally posted by: Nova19

I have personally worked in high stakes situations where you must make bad compromises or lose all. If you have not, congratulations.

When asked, Hansel Mehta refused to comment on her taking over his film; although I see that as kind of a politically correct way of confirming - he is technically staying quiet. I have yet to hear Mehta say anything negative about her. Apurva agreed to her demands (he says so film could get released - she was refusing to complete patchwork) and he would have remained quiet too if she had not attacked his reputation as a writer.

Those who are speaking out now were either bulldozed by her (Asrani) or are leaking blinds. I ordinarily discount blinds as the work of liars or cowards but in Kangana's case, live by the sword, die by the sword. Lord knows I have read enough vicious blinds planted by Kangana.