What was so bad about Salman Khan 2000-2009 - Page 3

Originally posted by: Luna46

You are only showing one side of the picture. This is the complete film 😆
Even then he still he has 16 FAILURES between 2000-09 in which there are 9 FLOPS and 5 DISASTERS. 😆

You can call Average and above-average as Success, but even SRK is giving Semi Hits right now but still people think that he's in his bad phase. Infact SRK is still in the 3rd position in the current standing while Bhai was competing with the likes of Harman Baweja and Tushaar Kapoor in the last decade. 😆 If this was not a bad phase for Megastar Bhai, then Bhai's standard is very low.

Originally posted by: Cpt.DudleySmith

Nope. Check the verdict for that film by the no.1 B.O analyst at that time - Average (Losing in
some circuits).

http://www.rediff.com/movies/2000/jun/27box.htm

Originally posted by: I_M_SultaN

OK if u follow rediff

then tere naam is clean hit 😆

http://www.rediff.com/movies/2003/sep/23box.htm

so nott only wanted solo hit of salman 😉

Originally posted by: Cpt.DudleySmith

I don't follow Rediff. I go by Komal Nahta's verdicts in Film Information which he used to put up online as well in print (Rediff earlier and Koimoi later on as well as The Asian Age in print). The above BO column is not by Nahta but by Indu Mirani. Nice try though 😉

Originally posted by: Cpt.DudleySmith

What palti 😆 In the original comment I mentioned Nahta's verdict for DHLJ and i am sticking to that. Wake me up when you find Nahta calling either of DHLJ and Tere Naam a hit 😉

Originally posted by: 09tanki

<font color="#006633">sawaan was in 2006 which is another disaster😆there must be many hidden gems like sawaan which people might not remember</font>