Does Ranveer Singh has looks? - Page 10

Originally posted by: flameofdarkness

PREACH!!!!!!

Originally posted by: CaputDraconis

I think ARK is an eye candy. And that's about it. He's not charming. I am not sure if you like Ranveer or not, but he's super charismatic on screen that I prefer guys like him to mere antique pieces.

Talking strictly about looks here not acting, read the title before responding to things maybe

@CaputDraconis

Different strokes for different folks! But yeah, Ranveer falls short in the looks department. And charismatic? Ermm that's subjective, so I reserve my comments!

looks ho ya na ho , he is good in his primary job of acting which is commendable . Plus he has so many fans who like him so much so he is quite ok .

he should let his acting do the talking...

I do think ranveer is an amazing actor though! But looks wise nope! It is his acting that makes him attractive! It is also funny how people just assume how good looking people are bad actors! Aditya was brilliant in aashiqui 2 and dawat e ishq! Just because he is good looking doesn't mean he is just a show piece!

Ranveer Singh looks hotter IMO and his performance on screen surely accentuates his desirability even further.. I actually don't think Zayn Malik who's considered to be an Adonis incarnate, that attractive either. On the contrary, Benedict Cumberbatch, Robert Downey Jr,Ryan Gosling, Hugh Jackman et al are my kind of good-looking men.

Its all about acting. As long as they do justice to the roles they are given thats what matters. Good looking or not doesn't make any difference. Looks are entirely subjective so its pointless to even talk about it, all the so called "lookers" are finished they are nowhere most of them. It's the acting relatability and presence on screen and personality that lasts nbody gives a shit about a damp squib in the real world no matter how goodlooking you think you are, people have moved on from that long ago

Calling aditya a showpiece just because he is good looking does imply that one judges someone to be a bad actor just based on appearance! Anyone who knows even a little bit about acting would know that some of his performances have been amazing! Much better than what current fugly looking tv actors/actresses can pull off!

Originally posted by: corry

Its all about acting. As long as they do justice to the roles they are given thats what matters. Good looking or not doesn't make any difference. Looks are entirely subjective so its pointless to even talk about it, all the so called "lookers" are finished they are nowhere most of them. It's the acting relatability and presence on screen and personality that lasts nbody gives a shit about a damp squib in the real world no matter how goodlooking you think you are, people have moved on from that long ago

Looks are not "entirely subjective". No one can deny that Siddharth and Aishwarya are amazingly goodlooking