Deepikas father Prakash Padukone reacts to Ranveer Singh

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Kamala

@Kamala05

Sparkler

+ 7

Posted: 8 years ago

#51

On Topic this would be the reply of any educated and wise father .👏

I cannot understand the extreme hatred of some people to the actress and her family . Did they really expect him to deliver 1 hour speech on feminism and bash ranveer ? I would never appreciate if my father respond on my behalf if I am at DP's age . But I know what ever was his reply those who bashed him will make negative comments because people who are blind with hate speaks nonsense always.

Quote

Angel-likeDevil

@Angel-likeDevil

Trailblazer

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#52

Originally posted by: -iLoveZaynMalik
Marriage material = sundar susheel that type of stuff which is considered patriarchal. As in any girl who is not like a marriage material person is not worth getting married to! That's why it's wrong and sexist.

Marriage material means who you think would make a good spouse for you. Girls also speak of "marriage material" when it comes to men. It is not patriarchal.

Deepika is a marriage material to Ranveer, he isn't declaring that she is marriage material in the country or something. The question was put to him, in his eyes, she is marriage material... it differs for different guys. His opinion of who is a marriage material is wrong?

Don't we all(most of us) have an idea of what type of person we'd like to marry? And since when did having an opinion of who we'd like to marry mean that the others aren't worth getting married? It's just personal preferance.

Edited by Angel-likeDevil - 8 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

the notebook

@the_notebook

Sparkler

+ 8

Posted: 8 years ago

#53

Originally posted by: Angel-likeDevil

Marriage material means who you think would make a good spouse for you. Girls also speak of "marriage material" when it comes to men. It is not patriarchal.
Deepika is a marriage material to Ranveer, he isn't declaring that she is marriage material in the country or something. The question was put to him, in his eyes, she is marriage material... it differs for different guys. His opinion of who is a marriage material is wrong?
Don't we all(most of us) have an idea of what type of person we'd like to marry? And since when did having an opinion of who we'd like to marry mean that the others aren't worth getting married? It's just personal preferance.

It really does not mean what you are saying. He could have said something else if he meant it in a way you are trying to project. And it's wrong when girls do that too about calling a guy marriage material but it is mostly happening with girls so you shouldn't try to lessen how severe it is - like a girl above 30 is called not marriage material, if a girl is a working woman she is not marriage material, if a girl is not fair she is not marriage material etc. It's very wrong.

It is not personal preference. It is him declaring what kind of a girl comes in category of marriage material or not. If he meant it that he just likes Deepika and finds her to be what he wants to marry, he should have said she is his girl of dreams instead of saying she is marriage material

Edited by -iLoveZaynMalik - 8 years ago

Quote

Angel-likeDevil

@Angel-likeDevil

Trailblazer

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#54

Originally posted by: -iLoveZaynMalik
It really does not mean what you are saying. He could have said something else if he meant it in a way you are trying to project.
It is not personal preference. It is him declaring what kind of a girl comes in category of marriage material or not.

😆 ..sorry I couldn't resist using this :p

Alright, we can agree to disagree! 😊 Peace lol.

Quote

the notebook

@the_notebook

Sparkler

+ 8

Posted: 8 years ago

#55

^^Read the post above I added more to help you understand

Quote

1017676

Hibernated

Posted: 8 years ago

#56

Originally posted by: saymaF29

@bold- You know what they call such men who feed off their daughters' earnings and compromises in life? Oh well.. lets leave it.

No we dont . Please tell us.

Serioisly.. disgusting thinking.He has his own achievements and is respected if you cared to google.

Quote

anjs

@anjs

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#57

Originally posted by: GrumpyTheCat

No we dont . Please tell us.

Serioisly.. disgusting thinking.He has his own achievements and is respected if you cared to google.

seriously, from where do people even come up with this shit, without any proofs, just cause he is DP's dad.

wonder what they themselves have achieved in life, to question such a respected sport person.
Here are some of his achievements, if they can read that is :
Prakash Padukone

Founder - PPBA

Indian sporting legend and the visionary behind the Academy's successful inception, Prakash Padukone lends much more than just his name to the Prakash Padukone Badminton Academy.

Prakash has won several awards such as the prestigious Arjuna Award in 1972 and the Padma Shri in 1982 in recognition of his outstanding achievements in the world of badminton. Some of his feats include:

World Rank No. 1 (1980-81)
First Indian to win the prestigious All England Badminton Championships (1980)
First World Open Prize Money Badminton winner at Royal Albert Hall,London (1979)
World Cup winner, Kuala Lumpur (1981)
Gold Medalist at Commonwealth Games, Edmonton (1978)
Ranked in the top 5 in the world for over 5 years
Won the Senior Nationals titles consecutively for 9 years
Bronze Medalist at Asian Games, Tehran (1974)
Bronze Medalist at World Championships, Copenhagen (1983)
English Masters (1978); Danish Open (1980); Swedish Open (1980); Dutch Open (1982); Hong Kong Open (1982)

http://www.ppba.in/about-us/management/

Quote

darkzarhi

@randomuserl

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

#58

Originally posted by: -iLoveZaynMalik
It really does not mean what you are saying. He could have said something else if he meant it in a way you are trying to project. And it's wrong when girls do that too about calling a guy marriage material but it is mostly happening with girls so you shouldn't try to lessen how severe it is - like a girl above 30 is called not marriage material, if a girl is a working woman she is not marriage material, if a girl is not fair she is not marriage material etc. It's very wrong.
It is not personal preference. It is him declaring what kind of a girl comes in category of marriage material or not. If he meant it that he just likes Deepika and finds her to be what he wants to marry, he should have said she is his girl of dreams instead of saying she is marriage material

Completely agree with you -iLoveZaynMalik! 😊

Quote

the notebook

@the_notebook

Sparkler

+ 8

Posted: 8 years ago

#59

Originally posted by: saymaF29

@bold- You know what they call such men who feed off their daughters' earnings and compromises in life? Oh well.. lets leave it.

Lol Prakash Padukone is very successful even without Deepika, everyone in her family is super successful. 😆 She grew up into an affluent family which is ofcourse cos of her father so it's like a team effort and not just Deepika Padukone being the sole breadwinner or anything

Quote

Nalanin1987

@tamil_nalan

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

#60

Finding Ranveer a sexiest because of his marriage material comments is one thing, but degrading Deepika's father is way too much.
It's normal not to like Deepika but why the hate on her father? I really understand how you can not like someone but I really don't get it how you can hate someone so much, that you hate automatically everything about her including her family members. That's really unhealthy 😕 .

I know there have been "just" 2-3 post which were talking bad about him, but alone that was too much...

Quote

1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9

Ranveer Singh

Deepikas father Prakash Padukone reacts to Ranveer Singh - Page 6

Related Topics

Explore Topics