Video: Kangana's IV with Rahul Kunwal | India Today - Page 4

On Barkha's show Kangu was asked about Two Thumbs' case but she kept replying about her abusive ex Pancholi and Suman's impure blood comment.

Both interviews seem to be pro KR, putting her on high pedestal .
Her 3 national awards was mentioned 5-6 times in 8 mins Burkha interview !!
Very well played by KR. She demolished Adhyayan and reduced him to less than silly ex 😆

@Nova I absolutely agree with the questions you put up but u see this was nothing more than a PR exercise. The reporters did not ask such questions about the case because obviously she had no answer to them and an interview that was supposed to project her in good light would obviously not include hard hitting questions. So lets leave it to the court to ask the relevant questions.

As for the interview, being a woman it surely sounds rosy when another woman sounds so unbashed and confident about any good bad or worse things associated to her, but again this is quite subjective. So tomm for example if a woman who was raped claims she is unashamed of what happened to her, I would feel proud. But if a woman who put false rape allegation on a man n got him jailed says shes proud of what she did or what happened to her, I would feel like slapping her. I hope ppl get the point.

If shes proud of her mistakes/insanity then its her own decision but its for the court to decide if her insanity is to be accepted or not.

Here's the thing about Kangana, what is so empowering about her? People being taken in by the image she projects of being a brazen, confident woman who doesn't give a damn about anything are being fooled. This is someone who begged for a man's attention for MONTHS. So much so that even his utter silence didn't shock her to her senses. What is so empowering about a woman that does that? A woman that relentlessly pursues and begs for a man's attention? Obsesses about someone who pointedly ignores her? Not to mention a woman who clearly is disdainful of her fellow actresses and refers to them in a less than complimentary manner? What is so empowering and confident about that?

no one is talking about women empowerment... Nor is she playing the women card... What's it with Shobha De type comments . Atleast hear the video before writing anything...

Movie people we know a lot about, probably a lot more than our distant relatives. Their childhoods, likes, dislikes, love affairs are played before our eyes. So much as we want to believe we know them, we don't. We only see a persona.

Originally posted by: davidb

if by chance she had a relationship with HR and she has proof of it...she puts it out in court she can still turn things in her favour on that front as well. it is all a matter of a timing. by now most people assume she is delusional on that front.

Originally posted by: Nova19

I am still here. I can't be too impressed with Kangana's performance since I am busy wondering how two supposed reporters could have not asked some real questions instead of allowing her to answer clearly prediscussed questions and answers (including repeats between the two interviews). Why not something like, you mention women who are sexually active are called wh**es, and have said you were in a "relationship" with Hrithik but he denies this; please clarify what you mean by that word, specifically were you physically intimate/sexually active with him and are you saying he's lying? How can people "have different perspectives" on whether they were in an intimate relationship or does that word mean something different to you? Or, why did you decide to make this case public, what did you hope to gain? Or, do you have Aspergers and have you ever said you did? Or, were those leaked emails written by you? Or, you have said Hrithik Roshan stalked you, spied on you, and was obsessed with you, if you were ready to publicly make those claims why are you now unwilling or unable to provide proof? In the past you have said Suman ended the relationship with you and implied Hrithik, no longer desired you one fine day (note if I were a reporter I would have the real quote), so when you say, a mans mentality is if I can't get you, I will destroy you, who are you talking about exactly? On and on the list goes... if only she were willing to sit down with an actual impartial journalist.

1. I think she must have prepared. As in run through a series of questions. I mean there are only certain topics they can ask. That is what they do even for the US Presidential debate if they want to project "Presidential".

Originally posted by: Nova19

I am still here. I can't be too impressed with Kangana's performance since I am busy wondering how two supposed reporters could have not asked some real questions instead of allowing her to answer clearly prediscussed questions and answers (including repeats between the two interviews). Why not something like, you mention women who are sexually active are called wh**es, and have said you were in a "relationship" with Hrithik but he denies this; please clarify what you mean by that word, specifically were you physically intimate/sexually active with him and are you saying he's lying? How can people "have different perspectives" on whether they were in an intimate relationship or does that word mean something different to you? Or, why did you decide to make this case public, what did you hope to gain? Or, do you have Aspergers and have you ever said you did? Or, were those leaked emails written by you? Or, you have said Hrithik Roshan stalked you, spied on you, and was obsessed with you, if you were ready to publicly make those claims why are you now unwilling or unable to provide proof? In the past you have said Suman ended the relationship with you and implied Hrithik, no longer desired you one fine day (note if I were a reporter I would have the real quote), so when you say, a mans mentality is if I can't get you, I will destroy you, who are you talking about exactly? On and on the list goes... if only she were willing to sit down with an actual impartial journalist.