Anushka has starred with all 3 KHANS now, has she gained anything?!

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

dietcoke1

@dietcoke1

Voyager

Posted: 9 years ago

#31

no she hasnt gained anything... jus fame...fortune ( in forbes top 20 this year ), the opportunity to work with legends like SRK, aamir, salman and talented directors like raju hirani, karan johar...at the power to open her own production house and make films she believes in...and have the head of YRF adi chopra believe in you...and to consider ppl like ranbir kapoor ur buddy and Virat kohli as boyfriend...

no nothing gained at all...no actress would want to be in her position 😆

she has to keep doing these big films so she can still do those small films she wants to produce

Edited by dietcoke1 - 9 years ago

Quote

Meeti-Mirchi

@Meeti-Mirchi

Voyager

Posted: 9 years ago

#32

Has She?

I know tht she has worked with A listers, Has worked with A lister actors, Has worked with Khans but why then has she not made a mark?

I mean when we speak about Kangana - we remember Datto and queen, Priyanka is known for Roma, Deepika is still remembered as the dream girl of OSO and Meenalochani ..even the recent actress like Sonakshi is known for her "Thappad se"dialogue yet Anushka does not have have a stand out role or something that ordinary plebians like us can attach to. or is there?

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Blackwater

@Blackwater

Voyager

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#33

Well only here i m listening she isn't successful..being called an A lister when she has no Godfather in BW isn't an achievement?? she must hv done something to b referred in d league of deepika, kareena, katrina n priyanka..N LMAO was her role in pk a flowerpot?? Again on if it is called as...She's not only one of d actresses to work wid all 3 khans bt also d only one to hv substantial roles in dere movies too (excluding Sultan as her role is not known)

Quote

dietcoke1

@dietcoke1

Voyager

Posted: 9 years ago

#34

Originally posted by: Maul-E-Wood

Has She?

I know tht she has worked with A listers, Has worked with A lister actors, Has worked with Khans but why then has she not made a mark?

I mean when we speak about Kangana - we remember Datto and queen, Priyanka is known for Roma, Deepika is still remembered as the dream girl of OSO and Meenalochani ..even the recent actress like Sonakshi is known for her "Thappad se"dialogue yet Anushka does not have have a stand out role or something that ordinary plebians like us can attach to. or is there?

what exactly is ur definition of making a mark? what more does anushka need to do in your eyes to be considered successful?? yes Kangana, PC and DP have quite a few memorable roles but they've all done double the no. of films ansuhka has...Sonakshi only has dabangg and lootera...and those r diluted by all the other mindless films she has done.

as for anushka...suprisingly on twitter she still gets most amount of love for taani partner in RNBDJ, then BBB and nowadays NH10...and she has only done around 10 movies...and everyone considers her a decent actress..

Edited by dietcoke1 - 9 years ago

Quote

_shadesnature_

@_shadesnature_

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#35

She gained some lost so many things many good directors spoiled her ...or didn't use her talent properly

But sultan may make a difference

BTW no one can gain proper screen space with aamir ...so its obvious

Quote

807116

Hibernated

Posted: 9 years ago

#36

Originally posted by: kabeeraspeaking
Starring with all 3 Khans has no material meaning, but it is a rare occurrence (and their achievements/contribution to BW are huge phenomena) so it's only something symbolically nice to be a part of. Is there any benefit to it? Yeah, I think it shows that directors/films with a variety of sensibilities can go to her and expect her to fit into the required canvases, which says something about her skill/presence as a performer. Also, she makes for a convincing pair with all 3 who are much older than her...something that others of her generation (given the chance) haven't all been able to do, so it also shows some versatility or chameleon-like quality.

On bold. It is something like we hear, "This year, 5 planets are alligning in a straight line. It is a rare occurrence. This Month will have 5 Sunday's. It only happened 27 years before ..." etc. It is for the record keeping, but does not signify anything. But as someone pointed out, if she is wisely investing the money she earned from flowerpot roles to create a meaningful cinema, then these roles matter. In the case of Kareena or Katrina, it did not happen. Hence people are more cynical.

Quote

@TheRowdiest

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 9 years ago

#37

She has done good ? She is secure ? 😆

Truth is she is getting no movies , whatever the movies she got , there must be lots of hard work -connections, lobbying- behind it , still she is getting only 15 mins roles

Working with yrf films , dating a cricketer makes u A lister , not a big deal

If she is so secure then why did she ruin her Face ? 😉

Quote

kabeeraspeaking

@kabeeraspeaking

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#38

Originally posted by: flipfl0p

On bold. It is something like we hear, "This year, 5 planets are alligning in a straight line. It is a rare occurrence. This Month will have 5 Sunday's. It only happened 27 years before ..." etc. It is for the record keeping, but does not signify anything. But as someone pointed out, if she is wisely investing the money she earned from flowerpot roles to create a meaningful cinema, then these roles matter. In the case of Kareena or Katrina, it did not happen. Hence people are more cynical.

Thank you for summarizing my posts in the threads, I appreciate it 😆

Quote

Midnight

@Midnightsorrow

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

#39

Sadly she haven't gained much. And it's sad because she's a better actress than Deepika, Katrina, Sonam etc... She needs more good roles like NH10 & BBB.