| Baahubali | Official Updates & Discussion Thread #1 | P150 NEXT - Page 115

Originally posted by: -FreeLancer-

can anyone tell me, is it a common phenomena to have acclaimed directors attend audio launches of movies are not shot by them?, I mean like SSR went to attend Mirchi's and Kanche's..

++++++++

Hershu - read this about size zero..the audio launch of Size Zero', which is supposed to be held on September 6th, has been postponed due to unavoidable circumstances.PVP Cinema will announce the new date soon.

Originally posted by: -ISakuraS-

@ bold - Usually, in these old movies with king, queen stories, the queen calls the king as "king".. so in tamil, it would be something like

Manna, Arase/Ilavarase (if he is still the prince when he gets married to her), Maharaja..

I really hope they can find another word that means the same because the ones I mentioned above can be used by any common man for Amarendra.. I want something more private & personal between the two..

If we go with any of our ideas, where Amarendra meets Deva in disguise, they might've introduced themselves with a fake name (Amar or Deva), or they might've scolded the other person by some name.. it would be nice if they continue to use those names as endearments later.. You know how we sometimes fondly call our close ones "rowdy" or "Rakshashan/Rakshashi" nowadays .. something like that..

Originally posted by: -FreeLancer-

haha, floating on twitter😆😛 yeah I know--😆 thats why the edit looks like they are about to kiss instead😆

++++++++++

Rajkumar/ Yuvraj sounds so awesome😉☺️

and then Amarendra can ask her to address him by his first name/ Amar😉😳😆

Id be happy to see her address him as "Jaanu' or better "DARLING" though😉

Originally posted by: -FreeLancer-

yeah but what if they were progressive and SSR shows them inventing these pet names then, which centuries later we are using ?🤣

+++++++++

seriously - She may just not call him anything in specific..I dont think they were allowed to take their names back then, so high probability is that she just called him "Aap" or Veer-eshwar (as in Brave person?)? in telugu?😆

imagine devsena saying this -

Devsena - "Aap Khaaney main kya khaayenge?"😳

Amar the hottie - *Scratching head* Mischievous smile - "Aapko"!☺️

🤣

Originally posted by: Meenu_Luvs_ASR

Aye.. Because he called her mad as she was picking sticks... which she was not.. she had a reason and as close associate, he should have known that she wouldn't do anything without reason.. so she is angry!

Originally posted by: Meenu_Luvs_ASR

Yo I would love this..

It will be so cute.. mainly during their little tease time

Originally posted by: ratna.nanda

Ya,I agree.instead of the usual 'maharaaj /samrat ',itd be interesting if they had nicknames for each other (or atleast deva had one for baahu,if as per our guess,they ever met while disguised. ),baahu can fondly call her deva .

Meenu mentioned in pg 144 that 'raajugaru' would be apt in Telugu .I agree,it sounds sweet.

Hindi:'yuvraj' seems fine.isn't it??

In Tamil :manna sounds too formal.so does arase /ilavarase.but can't rule them out.

(And the problem is whatever they call in Tamil ,they'll literally copy it without a thought in Malayalam, and imagine having devasena call him 'rajakumara' or 'Maharajaa '/'yuvarajave'😕.)

So considering the language issue,I think amarendra would be just fine. (Though those days, the queen wives never took their king's name,and they never showed how shivgami addresses bijjaladeva. )

Originally posted by: -ISakuraS-

Ofcourse😛

Yeah, even if he was only trying to do what's best for Baahu & family or Mahishmathi, he was indirectly a reason for Baahu's death and Deva's plight till now. So It makes sense for him to feel like he betrayed them..

@bold - Really? Any guesses besides the fact that Sivagami couldn't haveve safely escaped through that waterfall especially when she were hurt?

I understand that it was a growing phase.. but something didn't click for me with their track.. but yes I liked him after his entry into Mahishmathi.. Yes eagerly waiting for Amarendra-Deva track

Originally posted by: ratna.nanda

@bold if they have any in the movie😕.

i'm thinking the movie should be for full 3 hrs and some extra minutes.[some HP movies were like that.] and who'll complain😆??

Originally posted by: -ISakuraS-

Ratna, if Baahu was of age when his father died, then he would become the next king.. but because he was not, and Bijjala was his brother too.. it would technically go to Bhalla (as he is elder).

Sivagami is definitely the epitome of justice.. If she had wanted, she could've easily made Bhalla the king.. no one would've dared to speak against her.. but she didn't. She gave both her sons equal chance.. well explained!thanks ishita.

@italics - I agree.. how did she live with him? their marriage might have been a sort of political alliance.

With regards to Bhalla though, I don't think she knew him as well as she knew Baahu.. Bhalla's character is suppose to be a little mysterious.. no one really knows what he is thinking. He never says anything or rebels against anything (in the flashback in part 1). Yes being the mother, she probably knew that they were different but don't think she knew the extent of it.. She only saw a glimpse of him in the war (where he didn't care about the people of his kingdom).. exactly.bhalla was very silent in the fbs in part 1,never vocal about his wishes even in front of his dad who openly supported him.ya,but she saw a glimpse of his ruthlessness during the war,and she would've decided that he would not be the king whatsoever is the outcome of the war.baahu's actions just gave her a valid reason to put forth her point,and she was delighted.

i saw somewhere in a blog that why shivgami never admonished bhalla for killing the kaalakeya king,when her instructions were something else??[thats why baahu stopped for a moment and bhalla took advantage of that.]

SSR himself had said that.. he makes his villains super villains because when the Hero takes the villain down in the end, they become Superheroes.. It's just making the villain strong so that Hero is shown to be even stronger in the end.but here though in the climax,mahendra will win over bhalla,but showing bhalla doing away with amarendra in the war[even if by crook.] is tbh giving too much importance to the villain and unfair too.