Deepika's career graph like Madhuri's

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

.khoobsurat.

@.khoobsurat.

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: joyce_k
What nonsense!!!!

Does anyone compare Madhuri or Sridevi's graphs to Madhubala or Waheeda Rehmans graph.

Even today when these actresses are considered as divas still they don't dare to compare themselves or even any of their fans doesn't do that.

Each actress is totally different, Katrina has many hits but her acting abilities are total crap, infact calling her actress is insulting the profession, DP has only average performances while Madhuri and Sreedevi have done Chalbaaz and Mrityudand. How can one compare?

It's such BS to compare actresses graphs.

It looks like a despo move of some1 who doesn't believe in their own ablities.

"it looks like a despo move of someone who doesn't believe in their own abilities" well said..Seems to me her PR is over hyping her to cash in her recent success but they are only making her look bad by comparing her to actresses who were way successful than her!

Edited by beboholic - 11 years ago

Quote

Sharma

@lovanika

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: beboholic

"it looks like a despo move of someone who doesn't believe in their own abilities" well said..Seems to me her PR is over hyping her to cash in her recent success but they are only making her look bad by comparing her to actresses who were way successful than her!

I just don't get the word " WAY SUCCESSFUL" as I just don't get the word " INFLATION".

Every era has a set of actors and actresses which are successful at that particular era. With the exception of Big B. Big has managed to give hits in nearly every decade since he came into the films.

Madhuri and Sridevi were the top actresses of that time...so were Nargis and Meena Kumari...and so are Deepika, Sonam and Parineeti. These are young actresses of this generation.

If you take a survey of youth, they will or name Madhuri or Sridevi..they will name Deepika, Katrina, Priyanka...bring Madhuri and ask her to do a YJHD or CE or Ramleela. I can see her doing all these roles. So can I see Deepika do Ram Lakhan, TEZAAB or a Parinda.

Who from this generation remember Govinda, Anil Kapoor or Sunny Deol...kids are crazy for Sid, Ranbeer, Ranbir, Shahid and all...

Only Big B, and to some extent SRK, Salman and Aamir as managed to merge into different decades...but none of the actresses have.

Edited by lovanika - 11 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Koiza

@-koiza-

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

#13

LOL say what?

when did madhuri ever had critical acclaim? all she was famous was for dancing! she was herself in almost all the movies

dpad is a FAR FAR better actor! lets give her due and compare with some one appropriate!

ppl need to stop licking madhuri's ass- so grossly over rated!

Quote

Annie

@Star_girl

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: koiza.k
LOL say what?

when did madhuri ever had critical acclaim? all she was famous was for dancing! she was herself in almost all the movies

dpad is a FAR FAR better actor! lets give her due and compare with some one appropriate!

ppl need to stop licking madhuri's ass- so grossly over rated!

Okay this is absolutely true. Apparently, everyone on IF seems to believe that Madhuri is the best thing that happened to mankind. 😆 When not a single critic in her time praised her for her acting. She had a number of hit movies, and hence everyone seems to think she is the best actor of all times. 😆 If anything, Katrina was more praised in New York and MBKD for her acting. It is plain stupid to compare actresses of our generation to another generation although. Stupid and pointless.

Quote

Sonal99

@Sonal99

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#15

The year is 2013 and there is no actress Madhuri competing with Deepika.

So no comparisons.

Her success belongs to her alone. She will reign for many more years. She has the vision and hunger for success. She will change the history of bollywood where male actors got the accolades for successes.

Quote

Koiza

@-koiza-

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: Star_girl

Okay this is absolutely true. Apparently, everyone on IF seems to believe that Madhuri is the best thing that happened to mankind. 😆 When not a single critic in her time praised her for her acting. She had a number of hit movies, and hence everyone seems to think she is the best actor of all times. 😆 If anything, Katrina was more praised in New York and MBKD for her acting. It is plain stupid to compare actresses of our generation to another generation although. Stupid and pointless.

SO TRUE!

like I always say IF needs not to taken seriously- its seriously unhealthy as the competition here is totally unhealthy! some are over praised to the sky where as others are totally trashed!

IF treats madz like some God or something! the woman barely ever tried something new!

even kajol once said that madz never utilized her potential- she could have done so much more

and she was GROSSLY over shadowed by lolo and konkona

konkona was so good as laila in the movie- she put madz to shame!

even there madhuri smiled and giggled just like she did in HAHK- different roles, same acting!

she is a let down, so is hema- the latter is not praised that much here , thank God!

Quote

Mrs. Gossip Monger

@Surreal_Dreams

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#17

Dpad being compared to madz that is a huge compliment👏

Quote

Annie

@Star_girl

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

#18

Originally posted by: koiza.k

SO TRUE!

like I always say IF needs not to taken seriously- its seriously unhealthy as the competition here is totally unhealthy! some are over praised to the sky where as others are totally trashed!

IF treats madz like some God or something! the woman barely ever tried something new!

even kajol once said that madz never utilized her potential- she could have done so much more

and she was GROSSLY over shadowed by lolo and konkona

konkona was so good as laila in the movie- she put madz to shame!

even there madhuri smiled and giggled just like she did in HAHK- different roles, same acting!

she is a let down, so is hema- the latter is not praised that much here , thank God!

Madhuri is so freaking average. She barely acted in a few films. She herself never though she was a good actress. In fact, there were articles after articles in the erstwhile Filmfare magazine about how Madhuri can't act. But today, she is some kind of god apparently. 😆 Hilarious. And Konkona is, like on another league altogether. If you were bengali, I would have asked you to watch Dosar. She is one of the bests of our generation, truly. But her best works are, sadly, in bengali.

Quote

936725

Suspended

Posted: 11 years ago

#19

her graph is definitely better than madhuri.

from mahinder dhoni, to yuvraj to ranbir to siddharth mallya to ranveer to what not???

don't think madhuri had that attention in her graph. .. 😆

Edited by Black_Cat_ - 11 years ago

Quote

Sharma

@lovanika

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#20

Isn't Madhuri still being compare to Madhubala?????

Comparision is bound to happen but don't degrade today's actresses by saying that they are NOTHI G compared to old actresses.

The standard and bar of expectations have increased so much for these actresses of today that it is hard to imagine...today people want a combination of:

Nargis+Madhuri+LaraCroft+RakhiSawant+Helen+Nadira = today's actress

And still these actresses get bashed that they cannot be like Madhuri or Sridevi 😆