Adi Chopra driving wedge between Sushant and Abhishek - Page 2

For those who are saying it is Sushant's PR, considering its YRF PR which manages him, it would be interesting that they would come out with an article like this putting owner of YRF Aditya Chopra in bad light and saying he is driving wedge between mentor and protege, hai na?

What a lame article from SSR's PR. He chose the more powerful mentor. Why make it sound like two men fighting for a girl. Or are they all gay?

Yep Sushant is surely going to get his PR to send out articles about how bad Adi is. 🤪

Originally posted by: chocolover89

Yep Sushant is surely going to get his PR to send out articles about how bad Adi is. 🤪

The article makes it seem that SSR is the go to star for YRF. But the article actually doesnt put Adi in a negative light. Its only the title which does which we know is added by the writer to attract eyeballs. Adi is one of the most well known names in BW afterall.

If you read the article it says this about Adi. Nothing really negative...its more positive for SSR. I guess he is trying to prove he is YRF's new SRK: "And, as is the case with the big daddies of cinema, he is demanding. Of course, all the parties concerned continue to pretend that there is no stress. But one hears from the trade that as Adi's dependence on Sushant increases, the young actor is finding it hard to maintain a balance between his two godfathers."

Shreya,

Originally posted by: MrsMalhotra

The article makes it seem that SSR is the go to star for YRF. But the article actually doesnt put Adi in a negative light. Its only the title which does which we know is added by the writer to attract eyeballs. Adi is one of the most well known names in BW afterall.

If you read the article it says this about Adi. Nothing really negative...its more positive for SSR. I guess he is trying to prove he is YRF's new SRK: "And, as is the case with the big daddies of cinema, he is demanding. Of course, all the parties concerned continue to pretend that there is no stress. But one hears from the trade that as Adi's dependence on Sushant increases, the young actor is finding it hard to maintain a balance between his two godfathers."

The article says that Adi is possessive, demanding, and dependent on a newbie...all negative words. On the other hand, it says Abhishek fought with Ekta so Sushant could get paid more. It makes Abhishek look good, Adi bad...and Sushant like a poor victim stuck between them. Like Nikki said, Sushant's PR is YRF's PR. Why would they make Abhishek look good and use negative connotation for their boss?

Sushant doesn't need to prove that he is YRF's new "SRK" with such articles. The films they have given him are enough proof. They haven't ever given such big films to any newcomer so soon since SRK.

Honestly this article ruins things for Sushant more than anyone else..SSR is still a two film old newbie..This article insinuates that biggies like Adi and Abhishek are fighting over him..It victimizes Sushant and makes it seem like Adi is trying his best to have complete control over him..Yes, it also makes it seem like YRF cant do without him and Gattu was desperate to have him on board but it'l have more negative repercussions than positive if this were Sushant's PR work..You release articles to strengthen your position and create the illusion that you are in demand..But not at the cost of ruining your mentor's image..Which makes me believe this is not Sushant's PR..He cant be that foolish, can he?😆

Originally posted by: chocolover89

The article says that Adi is possessive, demanding, and dependent on a newbie...all negative words. On the other hand, it says Abhishek fought with Ekta so Sushant could get paid more. It makes Abhishek look good, Adi bad...and Sushant like a poor victim stuck between them. Like Nikki said, Sushant's PR is YRF's PR. Why would they make Abhishek look good and use negative connotation for their boss?

Sushant doesn't need to prove that he is YRF's new "SRK" with such articles. The films they have given him are enough proof. They haven't ever given such big films to any newcomer so soon since SRK.

So then its Abhishek's PR? OK!😆
And you are not giving credit to SSR. SRK was many films old when he got a chance to star in a YRF film that too as a villian. DDLJ too he got after they went to several actors. So SSR>>>SRK.

Originally posted by: poppy2009

Shreya,

Just because an article puts an actor in a good light might not necessarily mean that it is that actor's PR at work.

Sometimes journalists / reporters do write articles out of their own free will too.

Everything is not PR driven.

Mostly from what I know these articles ARE driven by someone's PR. If someone is made to look slightly negative it doesnt mean their PR has no hand in it. Gives credence to such articles as we can see several people disagreeing that it could be the work of SSR's PR.

Originally posted by: rogerrocks

Honestly this article ruins things for Sushant more than anyone else..SSR is still a two film old newbie..This article insinuates that biggies like Adi and Abhishek are fighting over him..It victimizes Sushant and makes it seem like Adi is trying his best to have complete control over him..Yes, it also makes it seem like YRF cant do without him and Gattu was desperate to have him on board but it'l have more negative repercussions than positive if this were Sushant's PR work..You release articles to strengthen your position and create the illusion that you are in demand..But not at the cost of ruining your mentor's image..Which makes me believe this is not Sushant's PR..He cant be that foolish, can he?😆

In film industry nothing matters apart from ability to pull crowds. Everything is forgiven and forgotten. Such an article without quotes hardly matters.