Is not Krrish-3 an incorrect title ?

Page

Next Last

Tanya

@tanya.91

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

I mean WHEN DID Krrish 2 came? , that they gave the sequel the title of Krrish 3 ?
Ok I understand Koi mil gaya was the first part, but the second part was named Krrish (and not krrish 2 or koi mil gaya 2).
So logically it should have been something like Krrish-returns or anything like that...because even Krrish 2 would have been wrong as it is the 3rd part of the sequel... first one was Koi mil gaya, second was named Krrish... SO... the next part cannot be labelled as Krrish 3 as there was no Krrish 2...
What u have to say about this? kindly share your opinion
thanks.

Quote

Frequent Posters

809123

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

I was thinking the same but Krrish 2 would be consider wrong too coz it is a 3rd sequel 😕

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Tanya

@tanya.91

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: bwtsweetu
I was thinking the same but Krrish 2 would be consider wrong too coz it is a 3rd sequel 😕

agree ... that's what I mentioned too... so technically both Krissh 2 and Krrish 3 are incorrect titles.
They could label the movie something like Krrish-returns ... Krrish-is back, Krrish-again or something on these lines... coz it seems absurd to have Krrish 3 after Krrish.

Edited by tanya.91 - 12 years ago

Quote

theprince

@theprince

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

peope who ask about krrish 2 is more that people who will watch krrish 3 🤣

its just atitle and title is all about attention and the roshan make wonder in this side because after ayear people still talk about the title

so take it easy krrish 2 or 3 will now make adifference

Quote

Tanya

@tanya.91

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: theprince
peope who ask about krrish 2 is more that people who will watch krrish 3 🤣

its just atitle and title is all about attention and the roshan make wonder in this side because after ayear people still talk about the title

so take it easy krrish 2 or 3 will now make adifference

its not about how great the movie might be or takin it easy or not, this thread is about how technically correct the title is.

Quote

MR.KooL

@MR.KooL

Achiever

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

third part will be named as "Krish 5"

Quote

@DB_reloaded

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

its third part of the krrish trilogy!!! so krrish 3

Quote

@DianaPrince

Inactive

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

delhi 6 isn't the 6th part of the movie

similarly khiladi 786 isn't the 786th part of the movie

there may be a reason for it,maybe within the movie itself

or because it is the third part of the movie

Quote

Caillou

@Caillou

Rocker

+ 5

Sarcastic Chatterbox

Posted: 12 years ago

2 number is not good for the roshans. they are advised against using it. hence its krish3.

Quote

ViccoTurmeric

@ViccoTurmeric

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#10

Originally posted by: LadyDabangg
delhi 6 isn't the 6th part of the movie
similarly khiladi 786 isn't the 786th part of the movie

there may be a reason for it,maybe within the movie itself
or because it is the third part of the movie

Thats A Very Good Point😲

Quote

1 2 3

Is not Krrish-3 an incorrect title ?

Related Topics

Explore Topics