Why Khans Never Given A National Award?

Frequent Posters

Kal El

@Kal El

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#21

Found the source @ NFA Archives:

36th National Film Award PDF file

It's on page 72.

Edited by Kal El - 12 years ago

Quote

643898

Hibernated

Posted: 12 years ago

#22

Dabaang wasnt Award winning performance, MNIK did deserve it!

But Tera Naam was magical!

They could have actually given him a sepearate mention just like FF did by giving SRK 'Filmfare Power Award' in 2004 or 2005

if hrithik can for dhoom 2 and SRK for KKHH just cos it was the biggest grosser so why not salman for dabangg 🥱

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

ViccoTurmeric

@ViccoTurmeric

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#23

Originally posted by: Kal El
Found the source @ NFA Archives:

36th National Film Award PDF file

It's on page 72.

SUCH A 'SHUD' HINDI! But i understood it😃

Quote

ViccoTurmeric

@ViccoTurmeric

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#24

Originally posted by: shakti_rock

Sorry...but SRK MNIK perfromance can be done ...

Ask any one to create Chulbul Pandey Magic...

Chulbul is more appreciated and famous then Rizwan ...

Award in not given on basis that hw famous a character is!!!????!!!

If that would have been the case Salman would have been wining all awards for past 3 years..

Coming to SRK wala point, as someone said - "Acting is Subjective"

Quote

ViccoTurmeric

@ViccoTurmeric

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#25

Originally posted by: _NaughtyBoy_

if hrithik can for dhoom 2 and SRK for KKHH just cos it was the biggest grosser so why not salman for dabangg 🥱

Filmfare s SRK chamcha nd so Salman hater!

But I still feel MNIK was more deserving

Edited by vedant123 - 12 years ago

Quote

643898

Hibernated

Posted: 12 years ago

#26

Originally posted by: vedant123

Filmfare s SRK chamcha nd so Salman hater!

But I still feel MNIK was more deserving

acting is subjective so i respect your opinion 😊

Quote

shakti_rock

@shakti_rock

Dazzler

Posted: 12 years ago

#27

Originally posted by: vedant123

Award in not given on basis that hw famous a character is!!!????!!!

If that would have been the case Salman would have been wining all awards for past 3 years..

Coming to SRK wala point, as someone said - "Acting is Subjective"

You forgot the 1st word Appreciated...

Like I said No one can Create Chulbul Pandey Magic like Salman does...

I dint saw any worth for Rizwan...like I saw in Kabir Khan ...

and yeah Acting is Subjective... lets just leave it then...

Quote

870349

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#28

Originally posted by: _NaughtyBoy_
that wont happen ! FF HATES salman IMO if they had to award him they wouldnt have ignored him for tere naam and dabangg 😆

Yeah but screen zee cine apsara all gave it to him . Maybe one day filmfare will

Quote

ViccoTurmeric

@ViccoTurmeric

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#29

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

Yeah but screen zee cine apsara all gave it to him . Maybe one day filmfare will

Way Salman is choosing roles! Sorry that might not happen

Edited by vedant123 - 12 years ago

Quote

605921

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#30

Originally posted by: vedant123

Award in not given on basis that hw famous a character is!!!????!!!

If that would have been the case Salman would have been wining all awards for past 3 years..

Coming to SRK wala point, as someone said - "Acting is Subjective"

sorru to say this but srk was irritating in that movie overacting at its best

Quote

1 2 3 4 5 ... 16

Why Khans Never Given A National Award? - Page 3

Related Topics

Explore Topics