Raja Sen's Report card for 2012 heroines

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

bsker

@bsker

Voyager

Posted: 12 years ago

#141

Originally posted by: desigal90

EMAET was a semi hit, Talaash a semi hit.
Heroine, had a spectrum of verdicts.

FilmFare- Hit

BollywoodHungama - Taran Adarsh- Plus, including both theatrical and non-theatrical revenues

IndiaGlitz - Succesful

Koimoi.com- Average

BOI- Below Average

Komal Nahta- Losing

This is what Joginder T. of Indlaglitz had to say
"A wrong perception was created that Heroine hadn't done too well at the box office"- Joginder Tuteja http://bit.ly/10JsYWH

But most importantly, in ALL THREE FILMS, Kareena got a lot of critical acclaim.
She gave not one but three critically acclaimed performances in a single year in very diverse roles.

Kareena's three critically acclaimed performances cannot compare to Priyanka's one. PC deserves to be in the A+ list along with Vidya and Katrina.

Quote

671100

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#142

Raja Sen is clearly biased for getting Kareena in A+ which clearly wasn't. Ek main aur ek tu wasn't a hit and neither was Talaash..heroine and AV were duds...yes she did win critical acclaim which might bring her on the A spot but not A+. oh well why am I complaining..almost every critic is biased

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Kal El

@Kal El

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#143

He says this is based on a combination of BO, image and public perception. It's not about the quality of acting. So the grades seem ok given that perspective.

Quote

671100

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#144

Originally posted by: Kal El
He says this is based on a combination of BO, image and public perception. It's not about the quality of acting. So the grades seem ok given that perspective.

KA EL..even if its not abt those things, he still gonna give her A+ i know...Baaja sen is like himself as usual

Quote

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#145

Originally posted by: Kal El
He says this is based on a combination of BO, image and public perception. It's not about the quality of acting. So the grades seem ok given that perspective.

Public perception is key, and that also plays into the number of brands they get offered to endorse.

I think Bebo has like 22 or 23 currently, ranging from Head & Shoulders, Sony VAIO, to Airtel all the way to Eclairs and Monarch Universal.

Half of em were featured in Heroine 😆

Quote

Hello_kitta

@Hello_kitta

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#146

People have problem that kreensa got higher grade than PC but nobody has problem that Katrina also has higher grade than PC and Vidya 😕

Quote

Nkapoor3

@Nkapoor3

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#147

Originally posted by: New_nova

People have problem that
kreensa got higher grade than PC but nobody has problem that Katrina also has higher
grade than PC and Vidya 😕

because Katrina gave two big hits!!!! BARFI was a huge hit too!! where else kareena did not give a single hit this year!!!

Edited by Nkapoor3 - 12 years ago

Quote

Hello_kitta

@Hello_kitta

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#148

Originally posted by: Nkapoor3
because Katrina gave two big hits!!!! BARFI was a huge hit too!! where else kareena gave not even one hit this year!!!

In that case Sonakshi has 3 Bigger Hits(RR,D2,SOS) and Asin has 2 hits (BB,H2). So, Asin and Sonakshi also deserved what Katrina got and more than Vidya Balan and PC 😲

Quote

Nkapoor3

@Nkapoor3

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#149

Originally posted by: New_nova

In that case Sonakshi has 3 Bigger Hits(RR,D2,SOS) and Asin has
2 hits (BB,H2). So, Asin and Sonakshi also deserved what Katrina got and more
than Vidya Balan and PC 😲

Depends on the criteria all I know PC deserves to be up there box-office wise and performance wise!! She deserves it much more than kareena