Originally posted by: Aubade.
That is the point really. This is the way I see things and I am still sticking to the India argument.
1. SRK films are different. I have always felt he does things in little less than conventional ways so even masala would not be typical masala which I do not like and I know many others who do not.
2. TZP. 3I, Gadar, DDLJ. Stop pushing them over and over. They are films which have risen above actors who play them. They were meant to be remembered either as numbers of as just plain brilliant films made. They happen very very very very very rarely and frankly speaking these will be the films remembered much more than the ordinary 100 crore movies. Whether SRK does them or not, that's his wish. But if you are trying to say by that statement that he is not doing variety, I strongly disagree. We can have another arguement altogether if you wish on that.
3. Swades and CDI. I bet you even SRK didn't except them to be huge successes that would define his career. They were unconventional. EVERY actor has atleast one movie like that. Its brought him numbers above others, what more do you want to discuss? Your current topic is to why he can't bring records now right? Where do these come in picture?
4. Romance - If people say he does romance like no other, I agree but if people say he can do only romance I disagree. YES, I would say that. I know so many foreigners who love the idea of a bollywood romance and the name that comes to them is ONLY SRK. Why? Ask that to random Indians you will definitely get other Khans on that list. So yes, the choice difference matters LOADS.
So in the end I stick to what I said. I am not here to change your opinion but I respect it and I expect the same from you.
57