Why has SRK not given any record setting film? - Page 32

Created

Last reply

Replies

328

Views

16.6k

Users

45

Likes

523

Frequent Posters

642126 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
@Aubade

Well stop this India argument please. Recent Aamir and Salman films broke records worldwide. Not just India. Vedant said SRK could either do masala or a film like TZP. You people trash masala. But what about films like TZP or SRK's own Swades and CDI? Why fans never speak a word on such films? Or is it that SRK fans (especially overseas) want mainly romance from him? So no one's gung ho for a CDI type deal either?
abandoned thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: Skepblun

@Aubade

Well stop this India argument please. Recent Aamir and Salman films broke records worldwide. Not just India. Vedant said SRK could either do masala or a film like TZP. You people trash masala. But what about films like TZP or SRK's own Swades and CDI? Why fans never speak a word on such films? Or is it that SRK fans (especially overseas) want mainly romance from him? So no one's gung ho for a CDI type deal either?


That is the point really. This is the way I see things and I am still sticking to the India argument.
1. SRK films are different. I have always felt he does things in little less than conventional ways so even masala would not be typical masala which I do not like and I know many others who do not.
2. TZP. 3I, Gadar, DDLJ. Stop pushing them over and over. They are films which have risen above actors who play them. They were meant to be remembered either as numbers of as just plain brilliant films made. They happen very very very very very rarely and frankly speaking these will be the films remembered much more than the ordinary 100 crore movies. Whether SRK does them or not, that's his wish. But if you are trying to say by that statement that he is not doing variety, I strongly disagree. We can have another arguement altogether if you wish on that.
3. Swades and CDI. I bet you even SRK didn't except them to be huge successes that would define his career. They were unconventional. EVERY actor has atleast one movie like that. Its brought him numbers above others, what more do you want to discuss? Your current topic is to why he can't bring records now right? Where do these come in picture?
4. Romance - If people say he does romance like no other, I agree but if people say he can do only romance I disagree. YES, I would say that. I know so many foreigners who love the idea of a bollywood romance and the name that comes to them is ONLY SRK. Why? Ask that to random Indians you will definitely get other Khans on that list. So yes, the choice difference matters LOADS.
So in the end I stick to what I said. I am not here to change your opinion but I respect it and I expect the same from you.
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
Fine. I respect whatever views you wrote down. He's good in romance but sticking to that genre hasn't done him much good of late. I think other members talked of films like CDI because such films help build more credibility among audiences and they flock to see any other film you do.

Anyways films are not rare (for a star in a commanding position like SRK used to be). He was offered 3I, Robot, Munnabhai MBBS, Lagaan, RDB but he refused them. Two of these films stand as highest grossing Indian films of all time now.

It's your opinion but I do not think any film he did in recent years was different except MNIK.
452840 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: Aubade.


That is the point really. This is the way I see things and I am still sticking to the India argument.
1. SRK films are different. I have always felt he does things in little less than conventional ways so even masala would not be typical masala which I do not like and I know many others who do not.
2. TZP. 3I, Gadar, DDLJ. Stop pushing them over and over. They are films which have risen above actors who play them. They were meant to be remembered either as numbers of as just plain brilliant films made. They happen very very very very very rarely and frankly speaking these will be the films remembered much more than the ordinary 100 crore movies. Whether SRK does them or not, that's his wish. But if you are trying to say by that statement that he is not doing variety, I strongly disagree. We can have another arguement altogether if you wish on that.
3. Swades and CDI. I bet you even SRK didn't except them to be huge successes that would define his career. They were unconventional. EVERY actor has atleast one movie like that. Its brought him numbers above others, what more do you want to discuss? Your current topic is to why he can't bring records now right? Where do these come in picture?
4. Romance - If people say he does romance like no other, I agree but if people say he can do only romance I disagree. YES, I would say that. I know so many foreigners who love the idea of a bollywood romance and the name that comes to them is ONLY SRK. Why? Ask that to random Indians you will definitely get other Khans on that list. So yes, the choice difference matters LOADS.
So in the end I stick to what I said. I am not here to change your opinion but I respect it and I expect the same from you.

Amal well said🤗
abandoned thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: Skepblun

Fine. I respect whatever views you wrote down. He's good in romance but sticking to that genre hasn't done him much good of late. I think other members talked of films like CDI because such films help build more credibility among audiences and they flock to see any other film you do.

Anyways films are not rare (for a star in a commanding position like SRK used to be). He was offered 3I, Robot, Munnabhai MBBS, Lagaan, RDB but he refused them. Two of these films stand as highest grossing Indian films of all time now.

It's your opinion but I do not think any film he did in recent years was different except MNIK.


When did he say he is sticking to romance? In fact he even said that he was doing JTHJ only because he hasn't done romance in a long time. What was Ra.One and Don? Just because they didn't hit expectations why do you want to label them as something conventional of SRK? Ra.One was a brilliant experiment and it actually collected 100 crore plus. And he played the sexiest villian in Don. Tell me where does that stand if it was so conventional of him being a romantic hero? Whether its worked for him or not, he is still doing things he is comfortable in and yet something that he feels will showcase atleast an ounce of a variant shade.
Of course, we do watch films like CDI for that very reason but how often does such scripts come in his way? And even if it comes like you mentioned in the second para, how is he to know they were going to be loved films? Is doing what he feels is right a crime? We fans don't care if it brings number nor does he. It doesn't really matter if he refused. In fact, even being his fan I say, Munnabai can be only Sanjay Dutts and 3I is definitely Aamirs in terms of actors so why can't SRK be SRK and do what he feels he can do justice to?

@Adi dii.. 😳🤗
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
Ra One is not experimental. Superhero or sci-fi films are not new to India.

The rest of what you wrote is just same stuff which fans say in defense.

He did stick to romance - chose KHNH over Munnabhai MBBS, KANK over RDB. He may have done a Swades, Don series, CDI but time to time has continued to belt out romantic films too.

Yes Sanjay Dutt and Aamir Khan fit those films perfectly. It's hard to imagine anyone else in those films, still his choices have reflected on his career in India.

We're just going in circles here!
.Kiran. thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: Skepblun

Ra One is not experimental. Superhero or sci-fi films are not new to India.

The rest of what you wrote is just same stuff which fans say in defense.

He did stick to romance - chose KHNH over Munnabhai MBBS, KANK over RDB. He may have done a Swades, Don series, CDI but time to time has continued to belt out romantic films too.

Yes Sanjay Dutt and Aamir Khan fit those films perfectly. It's hard to imagine anyone else in those films, still his choices have reflected on his career in India.

We're just going in circles here!


Romance is his forte so I don't have a problem with him doing romantic movies. I would be disappointed had he not done anything different from romance but he has done many different roles too. What else do you expect him to do? He's the only actor who's been consistent for so long now. NO one has broken his this record. His movie DDLJ has been running for the longest time ever now. Has anyone broken that record? He has given ATBB, BBs too. He has broken records as well and others have their own records. You can't expect SRK to break every single record. Why can't others break his consistency record? Why can't others break DDLJ record of longest running film? He has the largest fan following in the world. He's been ruling overseas for so long now. He has his own so many records. You can't expect him to break every single record.
Edited by ..Kirann.. - 12 years ago
668837 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: Skepblun

Ra One is not experimental. Superhero or sci-fi films are not new to India.

The rest of what you wrote is just same stuff which fans say in defense.

He did stick to romance - chose KHNH over Munnabhai MBBS, KANK over RDB. He may have done a Swades, Don series, CDI but time to time has continued to belt out romantic films too.

Yes Sanjay Dutt and Aamir Khan fit those films perfectly. It's hard to imagine anyone else in those films, still his choices have reflected on his career in India.

We're just going in circles here!

@Bold- Why create a post when youu arent actually understanding another's POV?
-RaeesRiks- thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: Aishh.

@Bold- Why create a post when youu arent actually understanding another's POV?


you said it which i wanted to ...👏
Edited by -ricky- - 12 years ago
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
I said that because it's just same argument going on again and again. Same responses even to counter - responses.

If it's about individual POV only then what's point of discussion?

Related Topics

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: MiVida_Messi

4 months ago

SRK fan leaked Sikandar, Salman fans vowed to not see SRK films

Apparently SRK fan called Ram Sharma leaked the movie online https://x.com/salmanicarman/status/1906265773946880184?s=46...

https://x.com/salmanicarman/status/1906265773946880184?s=46...
Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: cougarTown

8 months ago

Why Sush Why!

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DA8sGQVvl6B/?igsh=MWZ5bzBubHdsdGliYQ== It is sad to see her going this far..she looks almost unrecognizable

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: Elvis12

4 months ago

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood

1 months ago

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood

2 months ago

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".