Y So Much -ve response for Some Celebs on IF? - Page 2

Originally posted by: smartie_pants

its simple billa...people tend to root for the underdogs...

the people u mentioned like kalki, chitrangadha etc, they are the underdogs...they dunt have big hits, or huge fan following, they do lesser films and are low profile...so therz less exposure of them and their flaws as an actor/personality...so because therz less exposure, therz nothing much to crisitize abt them...we tend to look at them in a more positive way because we know much less abt their flaws than we know abt a certain salman or an srk...so their interviews, performances and anything abt them infact seems to be a refreshing respite from the regular khan bhajan...

with salman, srk, katrina...because they are so popular, most find them overrated and over exposed coz no one likes a particular celebrity being shoved in their face by the media...so, there tends to be a natural feeling of them being "overrated" and not deserving all the attention...people get bored of them quite easily because they are overexposed...furthermore, their flaws become more prominent because they do more films, are more hi profile and make more public appearances/statements...So,they are under a much bigger scrutiny than underdogs like kalki,rahul khanna etc...

also,like someone said, joh hai naam wala, woh hi badnaam hai...the more ppl know abt u, the more viewpoints there are, and hence, the more chance of being hated/disliked/criticised.

Originally posted by: Da_BagarhBilla

The names i mention of celeb which get +ve words just for having low profile, are they not given chance to gain Success or Stardom like famous superstars?

Everybody gets chance at Box Office, Every Actor's movie is showcase to world all over, who is stopping them 2 go for publicity campaign, or do whatsoever to get big openings to their films?

I assume atleast a minimum budget of Rs.5-10 is more or less invested in any film. Money is invested in their films also. If they can't please larger audience then why other's who make big becomes the target of bias -ve response??

Those who make BIG y they shud be targeted more? Success n Fans can't be bought by Money, if they did get then it's their Charm n HardWork. Believe it or not.

Originally posted by: wat_up

You mean here or in actual , because they rooting soo much then why not their movies not so popular ? where are their intellectual audiences sitting at home criticzing those who are a success😆😆

Also, when movies that people here think are brainless do well does it mean those seeing it are non intellectual?

and movies that people say are brilliant do poorly is because those not seeing it again are brainless and don't get good cinema.

Originally posted by: choco786

i am going to use shahrukh khan as an example seeing there is sooo many topics being made about him...i don't understand why there are negative comments made about him, in a quite positive topic...out of no where the stupid raisin thing comes up, his so-called affair with priyanka gets resurfaced and then people talk about him being gay...make up your mind is he bi or straight??? their are some that only do this because they beleive in exposing the truth and don't want to butlick celebrities, well good for you! but there are some here that actually like celebrities (not worship, like) so just because you don't like the particular celebrity and have this beleif that everyone should jump on the boat to be against that celebrity is unrealistic... please stop writing essays about all their negative qualities, because frankly u seem biased... i am not hardcore fan, so it is ok to point out some negative qualities of fans...but when every topic about them is aimed to downgrade them, it get annoying...

Originally posted by: smartie_pants

billa, actors like Nassiruddin shah, chitrangadha singh, kalki dunt care abt publicity...they dunt care abt pleasing the masses. They are low profile by CHOICE and not by necessity. They chose the kind of roles they do (arty films) by choice...its not that they are made to do such roles because they are unsucessful...

the kind of movies chitrangadha and all do , they dunt want to cater to a larger audience. they have their own niche and are happy in it...not all actors have to have ATBB to prove their credibility...

what salman does is entertaining the majority...gr8 for him...

but what chitrangadha does is appealing to her own lil section of audience...

as long as they are meeting the expectations of their target audience, therz no need for kalki to do massy films or commercial films...just like salman or katrina dont need to do arty films...

people are cut out for different things, and are appreciated in those zones...

just that BECAUSE sallu and others cater to more people, their flaws are more prominent and so they are subjected to a harder form of scrutiny than the likes of chitrangadha,..so sallu has a bigger hate base than chitrangadha...sure...but he also has a bigger fanbase..because the audience he caters to is larger...

its all abt the LOVE: HATE proportionality in the given section of audience...

500: 100 is the same is 5:1...the former seems more because it has a greater magnitude...