nonbias thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#1
My Name is Declined: Looking ahead at Shahrukh Khan's career outlook after MNIK demise
Monday, February 22, 2010

Dev Patel of the $370 million (Rs. 1700 crore)
grosser Slumdog Millionaire is a bigger
international star than Shahrukh Khan
The difference between a star and a superstar is that while a star gives hits occasionally, a superstar (whoever he is at the time) is expected to give the biggest hit and the superstar's films are always expected to take the biggest, top initial across India at the box office. To be excluded from this are actresses like Katrina Kaif or a Kareena Kapoor, who while maybe considered top heroines, are almost always incidental to the film's box office fate. That is to say, you can replace one with the other and it wouldn't affect the film's box office all that much. Barring a Meena Kumari, Hema Malini, Sridevi, Madhuri Dixit and to a lesser extent Aishwarya Rai (though some would dispute this too), heroines don't have much impact on box office fates of Indian films.

That brings the discussion to primarily in the domain of actors and leading men, of which Shahrukh Khan has been billed, by the media atleast, as the #1 leading man at the box office, a proposition that continuously falls on its face time and again. In fact Shahrukh Khan has repeatedly failed to measure up to the claim despite heavy political and media support for this actor over the past 15 years. To start off breaking this down before we do the lookahead, let's use a man he often used to compare himself to for these types of comparisions earlier, Amitabh Bachchan.

Today in his 60s, Amitabh Bachchan is a star who occasionally delivers hits like Black or Paa or Cheeni Kum. But Amitabh Bachchan was the undisputed superstar of the box office from January 1975 (when Deewar opened at 100% box office on 24th January 1975 and went on to run a platinum jubilee running next to Sholay later in the year) to January 1989 when after opening to 100% and a record box office response, Ganga Jamuna Saraswati crashed in its 2nd week. Still, even after the Ganga Jamuna Saraswati crash the biggest opener of 1989 was not Salman Khan's Maine Pyaar Kiya, or Anil Kapoor's Ram Lakhan but rather Amitabh Bachchan's Toofan. Similarly the biggest opener of 1990 wasn't Aamir Khan's Dil or Salman Khan's post-MPK release Baaghi or even Sunny Deol's Ghayal, but rather it was Bachchan's Aaj Ka Arjun. In 1991, the biggest opener was again Amitabh Bachchan's recordbreaking opener Hum. Even in the 'disputed' phase of his 'reign' as the superstar, he was delivering the #1 initials and remained the highest paid actor till 1998. But in most of the years between 1973-1992, Bachchan starrers were the top grossers and occasionally as happened to be the case in 1978, the top 4 grossers of the year (Muqaddar Ka Sikandar, Don, Trishul, Ganga Ki Saugandh).

Now let's bring this back to Shahrukh Khan. Even in his prime, Shahrukh Khan was never the undisputed superstar unlike Amitabh Bachchan. Right after Kuch Kuch Hota Hai in 1998, his next: Baadshah, sunk; failing to take the top opening of 1999 and then flattening out. Shahrukh Khan was not in either biggest opener nor the biggest grosser of the decade of the 1990s nor of the 2000s. And many feel if he sustained near the top through the 2000s, it was more to do with fact that most of new entries of 2000s decade such as Vivek Oberoi, Abhishek Bachchan, Uday Chopra, Ritesh Deshmukh, Abhay Deol were more there due to family labels and lacked either ambition or talent themselves. But despite this, Shahrukh Khan's films year in and out did not take the #1 initial. His biggest blockbusters were prone to being outinitialed or outgrossed by films of other 2 Khans, along with a Hrithik Roshan, Sunny Deol (circa Gadar) and couple others like Akshay Kumar later on. Now granted none of them went on to dominate box office themselves, but none of them go around claiming to be Kings or #1s either.

Which is exactly what the problem with Shahrukh Khan is and has been. Despite the Indian media collective and congress government literally taking the country's resources and putting it on the line for this guy, his biggest film ever, My Name Is Khan failed to open anywhere near the top, missing the top in opening at the box office by a distance and will have had a comparatively premature demise at the end also, causing many losses. By the end of the year, several films of several stars will leave box office collections of Khan in the dust.

And now after MNIK, Shahrukh Khan does not have any more releases coming up this year. He's 45 and it is difficult to see where his trajectory goes from here as he's facing a number of problems. Let's examine these problems in detail and regardless of political correctness.

Firstly though he aspires to be an international star, internationally he will never be reaching level of even a Dev Patel (of the $370 million grossing Slumdog Millionaire fame) let alone an Antonio Banderas in the 90s, a crossover star there, due to cultural reasons. A muslim chanting 'My Name Is Khan' was never going to become a big star in America, and only a deluded understanding of USA held by likes of Karan Johar would have imagined so. Johar's understanding of India itself is doubtful let alone America, Karan Johar is a bigger deal among industry tweeters than he is with Indian audiences. Which is why his Koffee with Karan or Lift Kara De end up getting lower TRPs in India than many other trivial shows. What is going to be an advantage in Karachi will be a disadvantage in mainstream Chicago or Chandrapur as we'll discuss below. America is a liberal country and tolerates muslims also, but it is not a foolish country, or unidimensional the way depicted in ridiculous bollywood cinema like Kurbaan and MNIK. These movies have no chance outside the usual Karan Johar/Khan segments from handful of countries settled as generation 1 migrants to USA.

So mainstream America is out for Shahrukh Khan. If the goal then is to become a middle eastern icon because of his proclivity to utter My Name Is Khan, then well there are a couple problems with that also. Culturally, the mid-east is not particularly homogeneously understanding of Hindi nor liberal enough overall which cinema needs. Secondly, and more importantly, a Qatar or a Baharain or even Pakistan, they are not all that consequential compared to India economically, let alone the west. If they were, they would have had their own established film industries by now. India is ahead of them all. It is the world's 2nd largest country by population and one of the major markets on earth, and will always be the dominant, determining market for Hindi films, with an economy that's outperforming the global recession and even some western countries. In Mumbai, many multiplexes' ticket rates are now about same as what US customers pay at US theaters. Ticket prices in even multiplexes like Indore, Madhya Pradesh and Kanpur are now substantial, except since Mumbai is quite saturated this is where the major theater economy growth will be coming in the years ahead. So if you keep your eye on the ball, the arrows are pointing towards the Hindi markets once more, and you can't ignore the audiences' sensibilities there.

Following off from that, secondly, because of the increasing cloud around his 'support for Pakistanis like Sohail Tanvir' politics, the middle India audiences are tuning Shahrukh Khan out. Especially middle class and mass screens Hindus (which were never particularly heavily in support of Shahrukh Khan cinema anyway). This is backed up by increasingly pedestrian TRPs when he is on television which is more dominated by this demographic. But bottomline is even at box office you can't get to those top all India initials let alone top overall grossers if the Hindis don't let you. It simply can't be done. It can work the other way (ex. Gadar) but not in this direction.

Finally his politics apart, the other big problem for Shahrukh Khan is now age, which is not on his side. He's closer to 50 than 30. An entire new generation of audiences has entered the theaters to whom overseas locales are no big deal, are much more confident about India (last year's big hits: 3I, Ajab Prem, Paa etc. all primarily set in India) and for whom Shahrukh Khan-Kajol movies like Kuch Kuch Hota Hai are themselves old, dated cinema.

This happens to all stars and aspiring superstars at some point. And there is nothing to be done about that. New stars are here and will come who will look, fresher, quicker, and more in tune with the times than Khan. And it will strike to him that people don't go to cinemas to watch khans. They go to cinema to get entertained. And accumulated hostilites from the Hindus, and accumulated wrinkles on the face, accumulated lack of speed brought on by the natural process of aging, tend to point to Shahrukh Khan's declining fortunes in the coming years. Not unlike an Anil Kapoor after the early-90s, if he's lucky.

The days of staking claim to the #1 superstardom for Shah Rukh Khan have been gone for a few years now and are probably gone forever. The question is how long can he delay the inevitable and remain a star.

Created

Last reply

Replies

12

Views

1.2k

Users

7

Likes

13

Frequent Posters

naadanmasakalli thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#2
can u give the source plz
Edited by fizzilicious - 15 years ago
tina59 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 15 years ago
#3
I agree with one thing here, Karan johar has a very wrong idea abt abt how NRI'S live and abt the general US civilians mindset and lifestyle. Saw Kurbaan yesterday and it was apalling the way it was portrayed.

I never liked his movies anyway, way too dramatic and illogical with absolutely no creativity.

SRK used to be my fav when he used to do good movies in terms of variety in roles. Now he does the same hamming again and again in every movies with the exception of one or two.

while others like aamir, big b even younger ones like abhay deol are trying out different roles which is mature and acceptable. Srk still does the same thing and people watch and drool over it.....

I like his persona offscreen though, he is a good speaker witha sharp business mind and sense of humor
naadanmasakalli thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#4
^^ did u even watched khan first watch it then talk about his character he has outdone himself and if MNIK is the same thing he always does then i guess something is wrong with me or with all the other people saying it's his career best work
135923 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#5
The second I read a few lines of this so called article I JUST knew it.. I just knew it... lol.. as to where this crap was coming from.. IBOS.. yes.. yehi hai yehi IBOS. IBOS really is making a name for itself in writing the most racist and crapistic stuff online. From calling the first generation migrants the only apparent losers to watch MNIK in US, to saying that congress funded MNIK to making an ABSURD analysis based on bias and their very transparent hatred towards Srk.. they have just outdone themselves in this one. What can I say! People on this website are definately despos looking to gain attention by very dirty and stupid means. As far as SRk is concerned many jurnos/people have written him off dozens of times, nothing new and he is still standing and these jurnos will come and go but Srk will always be there.
And yes people often get away with criticizing Srk by saying that he is upto his old tricks and is acting the same, but no wayz not this time. If some still think that Srk's act in MNIK reminded them of his Raj and Rahuls then there is definately something wrong with that analysis. Cauz Riz khan is totally unlike anything Srk has done before.
Edited by adios - 15 years ago
crazy fanatic thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#6
Ok, first off....Why is Dev patel being compared to SRK? Dev patel isn't a bollywood star. He starred in a famous British director's movie. Completely different scenarios.

Secondly, an actor can't keep giving hits after hits after hits. So what if Badshah or whatever flopped after KKHH? No one can guarantee only hits. Plus, in recent years, all SRK movies have been hits. From Don uptil now. 3-4 years. Consecutive hits.

Third, SRK is HUGE not because he's "assumed" to keep giving hits, but because he's one star who's managed to stay in the top 2 or so for TWO ENTIRE DECADES. The guy was an instant hit since his debut. And 2 decades later...still is going pretty strong.

And about breaking record. Um, RNBDJ was a freaken blockbuster, broke 2nd week record right after the Mumbai attacks! SRK did not even promote the movie because of 26/11. Still the movie went out to fetch 80+ crores. MNIK has the record of the biggest international opening!!

New stars will come, ofcourse. But how does that take away from what SRK has achieved? And please, all these new people like Ranbir and Imran, they've had the luxury of being a star kid, got huge launches. SRK is a SELF MADE man. And sure new people will take over...that always happens. You can't expect a man to reign and rule for 30 40 years! Everyone grows old.
crazy fanatic thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#7
Oh Adios..this crap is from IBOS?! LOL. No wonder. IBOS is a Bachchan fansite. They ALWAYS trash SRK. ALWAYS. Pft. I can't believe I wrote an essay in response to IBOS. 😆
135923 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: crazy fanatic

Oh Adios..this crap is from IBOS?! LOL. No wonder. IBOS is a Bachchan fansite. They ALWAYS trash SRK. ALWAYS. Pft. I can't believe I wrote an essay in response to IBOS. 😆

Yes IBOS it is! 😆 Who else could make this ridiculous stuff up..People at IBOS come across more of as comic fiction writers rather than jurnos. These people r just high on something..
Edited by adios - 15 years ago
crazy fanatic thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#9
I don't even care for IBOS. It's a very biased site, always working with negative SRK PR. And plus, like I've been gloating around, nothing can bring me down today, not even rubbish articles 😆 Haha
Edited by crazy fanatic - 15 years ago
naadanmasakalli thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#10
But u know what is funny that the bachans well don't know about others but abhi is happy about MNIK doing well he was congratulating karan and srk just this morning and here this site is bashing him lol. Anyways it's utter bullshit and the more they will try to bring SRK down the more he'll rise inshallah as he didn't needed daddy dear or uncles or aunty or mommy to promote him whatever he is he's on his OWN and am proud of it.

Related Topics

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: priya185

2 months ago

Aamir Khan talks about Dhoom 3 interesting track (Rimi Sen-Abhishek)

Aamir talks about Dhoom 3 interesting track with Rimi Sen- Abhishek https://www.instagram.com/reel/DLOupy6I3gE/?igsh=MTdrZ3hwOWc5eW81OQ==

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".