Originally posted by: sumishine
The problem with our mindset is that we let go the ones who are on wrong side saying they are always like that but criticise who take a stance against it sooner or later.
Bala stealing card n pointing out to Aajeedh is playful but Aari doing is bullying the youngest in group.
Aari supporting Vel is not a point but that will be taken as standing against Gaby for whom even her so called friends didn’t stand.
Aari supported Sumangali issue but in a way where he mentioned to Anita that it could have been done without taking Suresh’s Name (we all know Anita tried to score a point here).
When he notes something and mentions it, we ask why not ask then and there.
When he asks immediately, (passing the parcel), he’s not being sportive; (supporting Sanam on tharuthalai), he’s speaking in all matters.
I remember Aajeedh nominating him saying he was arguing in simple fun game and spoiling the mood but now we know there was a so called groupism n strategy behind it. So he was actually right that time.
Now there’s no groupism so he needs to tone down might not be correct stand because whatever cornering or insults happened were in past, so he can’t just leave it and start afresh. Groupism also is now not actively seen because of him voicing out or else they might still continue openly.
Sorry for the long post 😊