Originally posted by: panacea
You may not be right as you claim-this to be case of Vikas being portrayed as a sexual predator or Shilpa being treated as a favourite.
My simple question to you is how do you know whether Shilpa was not a victim of casting couch of Vikas?
If Vikas is so clean he should file a case against herasking her to prove her claims.If she was a victim she will continue to rant and Vilkas will make superficial condemnation of these allegations till some day more evidence surfaces -fo/against these allegations.
To me it appears Vikas has a shady background and he may not want to challenge Shilpa.
Firstly, Shilpa never claimed to be a victim of Vikas' alleged Casting Couch - she alleged that he indulges in it, and said the guys in the house should beware of him. That is painting him a sexual predator, and if she's laying the allegations, she needs to do so with substantiating facts at the very least, if not credible evidence. In the absence of that, such allegations made on TV are defamation. Tomorrow she could say he raped someone outside - so we must agree until Vikas goes outside and proves himself innocent of her accusation? I think not.
I've given my reasons for why I think Shilpa is a channel favourite, and you may not agree - I'm not here to be right or wrong. I put across my view, just as anyone else does. You think Vikas is shady - I think Shilpa is full of crap when she makes such allegations. Each to their own.
Edited by SP2684 - 7 years ago