Originally posted by: chandni_barbie
Omg.. ur being quite irrational here...
Requesting that a proposed fact be backed by evidence that deems it factual is considered being rational. Irrational behavior would be assuming every statement as a fact because someone says so.
Originally posted by: chandni_barbie
indian gays are known to copy western style, attitude stc this is what i have seen and observed.and it corresponds with person, i have spoken about it.
One person is not statistically significant. Of course you can make statements based on personal experience and observation. We all have to do that. But you need to qualify it as an observation not a fact. An observation becomes a fact when statistically significant data concurs with the observation.
Originally posted by: chandni_barbie
Fact is being gay is always a challenge in india compared to western countries There is a lot of fear in their minds whether our society will accept it or not. Ur thinking about gays is limited to foreign countries u should do a research about indian gays...what u said was universal ignorance
Yes, the experience of being gay is unique to each nation, even regions and cultures. There is a different set of challenges as well as support systems in each region. However, to consider that fear of rejection is unique to India is incorrect. The fear of rejection is universally true.
However, whether gay people have it hard or easy is irrelevant. Discrimination, stereotyping and bullying is wrong - and as such homophobia is wrong and Kushal's statements are wrong.
Finally, I'm just baffled as to what point of Yankees are you actually trying to counter with this. It just doesn't seem to follow with anything. 😕
Edited by return_to_hades - 11 years ago