Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 31st Aug 2025 - WKV
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 01 Sep 2025 EDT
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 31 Aug 2025 EDT
CASE IN COURT 31.8
Why Sidharth Malhotra films flop! Guess with the hint written in this
Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 26
UMAR KHAYID 1.9
Anupamaa 31 Aug 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
CID episode 73 - 30th August
Vicky says Katrina hates ‘honest feedbacks’ about her acting but…..
BALH Naya Season EDT Week #12: Sept 1 - Sept 5
24 years of Lajja
Why she gets bollywood movies
Happy Birthday wat_up 🎂
Celebs pictures during Ganesh Festival
Jee Le Zaraa Is Happening
Originally posted by: stunninstar
He was just telling that tell something other than this..!! They just took a wrong interpretation.. Their Brains are twisted..not andy's tongue..!
Originally posted by: vibhusharma78
I am shocked, when ppl talk about tanisha's fatso issue den suddenly female issue comes in between and all become supportive. But when it comes to character assasination of Prats same ppl start raiseing fingers.
Dis is called double standards.
We know what andy mean by saying all that crap dat time. dat was all rubbish. Further, he has fish memory, big mouth like armaan but has no brain. He eats his own worlds.
Saala gadha kahi ka!!!!
Originally posted by: ..Eclipse..
How can you be so sure of that?
Even Ajaz and Candy said the same thing that he meant nasty things !
ok...let me try to analyse it. As a regular viewer of BB, someone who has watched all the episodes of BB, i feel i have to some extent knowledge of how the contestants behave and think. When you hear the conversation for the first time, knowing Andy very well, no such meanings came to my mind. However when Kamya later repeated the words in front of everyone with a few twists to suit her version, it did seem like he was talking about sex. However it was Kamya who interpreted it that way and i dun believe Andy had any such intentions. We are all stuck with the new interpretations bcoz Kamya twisted the whole meaning to suit her game. She is one cheap lady.
But in that case how can anyone be so sure? I think its just a matter of personal interpretation. I personally think that he didn't mean it in that way, but I can understand why other people think otherwise. He probably should think next time before he does or says anything.
My point is that there was no character assassination. I don't think Andy meant it in a malicious way, but was simply saying that is there not more to the story and what happened next. It was Kamya and Prats that misinterpreted it.What Andy said creates a bit of confusion and can be taken in two ways. If it was meant in a degrading manner then of course he was wrong 100%. And I can equally say he was 100% wrong in what he done with Gau. My point is that Prats may have made an issue over nothing because it didn't seem as though Andy was saying all of that in a way to degrade Prats.
Originally posted by: ..Eclipse..
Nobody is sure!
But we can't tell Pratty off for feeling offended na?
She might be truly hurt!
And on top of that, Andy has the tendency to go overboard. we have all seen that previously.
Have you seen what he did to Asif? Made him sniff his dirty underwear? 🤢
Then the lingerie thing with Gau!
How can you trust Andy then?
Originally posted by: ..Eclipse..
Nobody is sure!
But we can't tell Pratty off for feeling offended na?
She might be truly hurt!
And on top of that, Andy has the tendency to go overboard. we have all seen that previously.
Have you seen what he did to Asif? Made him sniff his dirty underwear? 🤢
Then the lingerie thing with Gau!
How can you trust Andy then?