What would have actually been fair (IMO)

Page

chucknorris

@chucknorris

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

Both Tanisha and Kushal should have been evicted or both should be in the house. That would have been fair, in my opinion.

Physical violence is physical violence. Circumstances do not matter. Nor does gender of the victim and assailant matter. If it did then then you could make a case in favor of every past contestant who was evicted.They were all oppressed, some faced a lot more than what these two did. But if one person has been retained after physical violence, then you should apply the same standards on others and you might as well make physical violence legitimate going forward. If there is a selective treatment then obviously there would be allegations of unfairness.

Edited by silverbug - 11 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

xoSahiba

@xoSahiba

Navigator

Posted: 11 years ago

I agree. I am fond of Tanisha, especially over Gauhar and Kushal but violence is violence. Tanisha should have been evicted last week and Armaan and Kushal reprimanded for their behavior. And this week, Kushal was rightly evicted.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

chucknorris

@chucknorris

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: xoSahiba
I agree. I am fond of Tanisha, especially over Gauhar and Kushal but violence is violence. Tanisha should have been evicted last week and Armaan and Kushal reprimanded for their behavior. And this week, Kushal was rightly evicted.

Thanks. I agree, Armaan should have also been nominated at the very least for the way he pushed Apurva. Sadly, this was not even raised in any of the debates here or even on Saturday show. You cannot bend rules for some situations.

Quote

chucknorris

@chucknorris

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

Like Apurva said

Ladki chakoo bhi chala de woh hinsa nahi hai ??

Quote

Kiran

@kiran307

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

Tanisha shld b out or kushal shld b in.. That'll b the only fair thing..

Quote

chucknorris

@chucknorris

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: kiran307
Tanisha shld b out or kushal shld b in.. That'll b the only fair thing..

agreed.

and all the physical violence should be allowed from now on.

Edited by silverbug - 11 years ago

Quote

M.F.E.O

@M.F.E.O

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

if kushal really comes back ,then there will be chances higher of hitting one another even without caring about outcome as what it would be .. ,.they would only think if kushal could be called back then we also.. 😆

Edited by M.F.E.O - 11 years ago

Quote

SoPunk

@SoPunk

Sparkler

+ 5

Posted: 11 years ago

I don't consider Tanisha's one to be violence, she didn't endanger or threaten neither was in aggressive posture after the initial outburst.

Kushal's aggression was not an initial outburst, it was deliberate and he did it with the intent to cause damage with full aggression and it did put Andy in danger.

Most importantly, that was not an issue related to him. He acted like a kerayeka tattu.

Quote

chucknorris

@chucknorris

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: SoPunk

I don't consider Tanisha's one to be violence, she didn't endanger or threaten neither was in aggressive posture after the initial outburst.

Kushal's aggression was not an initial outburst, it was deliberate and he did it with the intent to cause damage with full aggression and it did put Andy in danger.

Most importantly, that was not an issue related to him. He acted like a kerayeka tattu.

If posturing really mattered, then pooja mishra wouldn't have been evicted. She did far far less than what Kushal and Tanisha did. She just tried to stop Sid as he was walking away to have a word with him. Her intent wasn't wrong either. I think Tanisha's posturing was quite aggressive. The intent was clear. She leapt out of the box and pushed him in rage. Then she bumped into him twice and admitted to doing it. End of story.

The whole point is that aggression is aggression. If we get into subtleties and nitty gritties of everything like posturing etc then everyone from now on will find loopholes like this and try to evade eviction by arguing over these things. I can smile and slap someone tomorrow and say that atleast my posturing wasn't aggressive so this is not violence. Already you can see how people are justifying Kushal's agression by saying that what Andy did was wrong.

Personally speaking, Andy should have also been evicted on grounds of obscenity.

Edited by silverbug - 11 years ago

Quote

What would have actually been fair (IMO)

Related Topics

Explore Topics