Imam is playing with their minds!

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

gangnamstyle

@gangnamstyle

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: diasingh2
I have one PROBLEM with Imaam.

He clearly remembers Rishabh's "Ek baap ki aulad hai" wala dialogue from the sand task
and he keeps mentioning it again and again...

But how come Imaam doesn't remember Mandana's "Tu Namard Hai... Tu Buzdil hai..." wale dialogues👎🏼.

it seems he already knows mandy (& roch)

he seems to be elevating both of them especially mandy

Quote

Dia Singh

@diasingh2

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: hippopotamus

Dear Dia Singh 2,

Let me explain

There is world of difference between the two abuses though I believe any abuse is wrong

What Rishab said was an insult to Mandana's mother. It meant that Mandana is not a daughter of one father or it implied that. There was no need to be this disgusting to anyone let alone girls.

Mandana comment was personal to Rishab. It means Rishab is spineless and his organ is not functional though we should not take it literally. Na mard does not mean dysfunctional organ but un manly- implying behaving in manner unlike men are known for which is aggressive, active, fighting

So please please do not compare

Imam is soft on Mandana because men are usually soft towards women (good ones at least) and they will tolerate abuse on their gender but not on women. In this case Mandana is a guest also and as Imam said he did not like the fact that other housemates ganged up against her as according to Imam this is not in line with Indian concept of athithi bhaavoo

I hope I was clear

Hippo

Agreed. Thank you Hippo!
I understood.

BUT one question ..!

Would you have said the same thing if Kishwar had abused Rishabh like that😉, instead of Mandy?😛

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

RamSiyaRam

@RamSiyaRam

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#13

Yes, Imam is trying to play with their minds and thats on instruction of BB team. Only thing is he should play with Mandy's mind too😆

Originally posted by: hippopotamus

Dear Dia Singh 2,

Let me explain

There is world of difference between the two abuses though I believe any abuse is wrong

What Rishab said was an insult to Mandana's mother. It meant that Mandana is not a daughter of one father or it implied that. There was no need to be this disgusting to anyone let alone girls.

Mandana comment was personal to Rishab. It means Rishab is spineless and his organ is not functional though we should not take it literally. Na mard does not mean dysfunctional organ but un manly- implying behaving in manner unlike men are known for which is aggressive, active, fighting

So please please do not compare

Imam is soft on Mandana because men are usually soft towards women (good ones at least) and they will tolerate abuse on their gender but not on women. In this case Mandana is a guest also and as Imam said he did not like the fact that other housemates ganged up against her as according to Imam this is not in line with Indian concept of athithi bhaavoo

I hope I was clear

Hippo

You have tried to twist it nicely but well it can be seen in another way too. Primarily when one says "naa mard" it implies impotency which is far worse than being fertile but non committal which is what Rishab said. And by science you can only be child of one father and therefore Rishab's comment does not hold water whereas Mandy comment is a reality. Hence what Mandy said is more deploring than what RIshab said. I would add here that abusing in such ways is wrong and should be avoided by both.

Quote

1011128

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: diasingh2

Agreed. Thank you Hippo!
I understood.

BUT one question ..!

Would you have said the same thing if Kishwar had abused Rishabh like that😉, instead of Mandy?😛

I wont spend time defending kishwar

Originally posted by: RamSiyaRam

You have tried to twist it nicely but well it can be seen in another way too. Primarily when one says "naa mard" it implies impotency which is far worse than being fertile but non committal which is what Rishab said. And by science you can only be child of one father and therefore Rishab's comment does not hold water whereas Mandy comment is a reality. Hence what Mandy said is more deploring than what RIshab said. I would add here that abusing in such ways is wrong and should be avoided by both.

That is the problem when one says agae ek baap ki aulaad hai then it means that u are not sure who ur baap is...it could be several...and u dont know..implying ur mother does not know...meaning she had loose character. if one woman goes thru relations with several men and a child is born then difficult to tell who father is..it is a gaali as bad as it can get..to say something about anyone's mother these dirty thing shows his sick mind. he only apologized when he saw his chances are in jeopardy since imam was making an issue..he should have done on his own

mandana attack even if taken in context of dysfunctional organ is still personal..its like rishab calling her chor. i never raised issue on chor.

Edited by hippopotamus - 9 years ago