The PR game and more.. - Page 2

All these are just excuses...ignore karne ka and Gautam ko vote karne ka. 😎

Originally posted by: sweetshruti

Yeah probably..But why disregard someone's popularity as "made up" to show that whoever you dislike is fake and unworthy?? I can never understand that.

Originally posted by: poiu123

I know why they call PR or fixed winner. Its becoz no matter how much they dislike gautam or how much ever they support their favorite contestant , gautams popularity and votes in this season cannot b matched by other contestants. It must be frustrating for the fans now. So they say PR and fixed winner.

Also praneet and sonali were very popular in this forum if not on national TV. So the eliminated contestants fans would want to find a scapegoat for their favorites loss. So easy for them to say PR.

Arre.. people saying this also know it's not completely fixed or all attributed just to a PR but how else can the popularity be justified? They need an excuse and hope that some of his fans will believe it's fixed and hence, won't vote for him so GG will lose. Warna unko bhi pata hai kiske fans zyaada hai.

Originally posted by: SoPunk

Has this post been drafted by PR? I don't think so, as it's not that professional one. 😆

But yes PRs do exist and in large numbers for some. PRs can work without much upfront money, it could be defendant on as long as they stay and they can pay from the money they will get from the show and prize money splits etc...so please don't bring that money issue here. If a show yields 1 crore, PR will not charge 2 crore or even whole money for that Jon...this is a very old logic. Doesn't work. How do you know which pr takes how much money? Why do you assume that they charge in billions? It's not bad to have a PR.😊

Yes it's bad to have it Fixed. PRs job is not only to write articles...but they work is every way possible. Like fake articles, fake awards, fake best 50s etc web hostings, Voting, Trending etc etc. The worst is, these PRs are pretty influential to make underhand deals to fix a winner. I'm sure they have financial transactions in the form of cash or arrange sponsors etc, since these PR people have good networks...so the worst and unacceptable part is, if they have been able to purchase the winner and fix the show.

All the signs and symptoms of the show, scream it's a fixed show, otherwise there is no reason for a small time side actor to get so much open favor & attention from the channel. Contestants didn't have equal fav like GG. For details, there is a topic with evidences, u may check. If u want I can provide the link.😆

Originally posted by: sweetshruti

Lol Maybe...Or maybe some people just can't accept that what they think about a contestant is just their POV about that person and not the absolute fact...They don't want to believe that a contestant they dislike is popular and liked by so many.

So they would rather believe that they are the only "smart" ones to see the real personality of a contestant while the others who like that person are either paid PR or stupid, naive viewers who got influenced by "PR" or as they believe "biased editing". 😉😛

Gauhar's win was guaranteed because general public sympathized with her common man strategy & she faced everything alone. Her journey was tough & deserved the win, which is why last season was a success in terms of TRPs.

So this year they tried to ape the same formula by choosing a victim material aka Gulati & then spoon fed him the entire season. The problem was that their choice was an undeserving crybaby & the favoritism was not balanced by an equal opposition like last year's Tanisha Arman. It became too one-sided & that is why everyone lost interest & the TRPs suffered.

Gulati's PR here is a form of nepotism & blatant favoritism by the host & channel. Its not popularity, its herd mentality, he will be a nobody again soon after the show ends like every other winner. The channel's economy depends on that so they are supporting him, glorifying his phattoo antics. But the fact is overall this season was a colossal failure.