Originally posted by: minzkumar
does it mean he was suppose to sit with them whole day and night and plan and plot? He did discuss when there was a need and involved himself in task. At the end it is all about who won the task and who didn't and who contributed in winning the task. Giving his name and saying he was not a team member was unfair cos others lost their tasks, some didn't help them win in any way at all ...
they were stressing on taking part r he is not present while discussions of game plan going n pritam stressed they were confused of rajneeti of gautam irrespective of gautam had any plan r not. while doing his task d task requires team work so every one in champions done their part including gautam.they giving directions to gautam n gautam looking at them n doing his task n they won d task so credit of tat particular task credit major goes to gautam as he is doing n ofc d rest goes to others n complete credit doesn't goes individually to gautam as tat task is team work task n if over all look in d series as they discussed by taking gautam aside n cleared stated as he didn't take part in discussions in game plan as they suported him his part in his task but they r complaining is he didn't contribute his part when necessary in gameplan for d tasks against challengers.gautam given them chance n they raised it n it's visible there irrespective of own reasons of all. so they given their pov gautam done his task successfully n overall he played as individual player in d series of champions vs challengers