Originally posted by: TheBoss
We are arguing about the same point, if you claim that we live in a progressive society then why is only the dude getting the blame here? If you don't want attention you wont get attention. Refer to my first post I have made it clear that my only issue here is her gender card, yet again. She is privy to the party and has no reservations in exchanging messages day and night for years and then she goes on to badmouth him behind his back as if she was held onto some gunpoint. But here she rather have all the influential contacts, she rather bait him with the end of her short stick by throwing bread crumbs and then she cries a river when he gives her the attention she is seeking.
This "Maneater" belongs with me in the cave.
The problem here is gross amount of presumptions, assumptions, conjectures and suppositions:
1. Assuming that Rahul hit the ground running by being his ridiculous self, hitting on her blatantly and being such an irritant that KT should have blocked him instantly years ago.
2. Conjectures about the nature of their conversations and then flogging KT over it...why did she even talk to him? Why o why?
3. Presumptions about why did she even remain in contact with him.
And to your - why is only the dude getting the blame here- much of it is based on historical data. Their conduct in public (I.e. Reality TV domain). While we have seen Rahul being insufferable, irritating and throwing himself at women without any thought and without any dignity...KT has conducted herself very well and with dignity. So people are likely to give credence to her.