3 Groups - Group A are strong players. Group B are middle of the pack. Group C are weak players.
Group A (6): Jay, Karan, Nishant, Pratik, Shamita, Teja
Group B (2): Afsana, Vishal
Group C (5): Ieshaan, Akasa, Simba, Meisha, Umar
Good strategy would dictate -
1. A should nominate either A or B (the logic being A can easily defeat C in the audience vote, so their motivation should be to take out A or B to reduce their direct competition)
2. B should nominate C (they are not secure so they should always try to get weaker contestants in the nomination to protect themselves in case they themselves get nominated)
3. C should nominate C (they are unsafe, so they have to hope that a weaker contestant than them is nominated)
4. Revenge - Nominate somebody who nominated you
Here are the rankings of who performed most strategically in nominations
Great Performance (5):
Afsana (nommed Akasa and Simba)
Ieshaan (nommed Akasa and Simba)
Jay (nommed Pratik and Vishal)
Umar (nommed Ieshaan and Simba)
Vishal (nommed Akasa and Simba)
Bad Performance (2):
Akasa (nommed Vishal and Afsana)
Teja (nommed Akasa and Simba)
So-So Performance (6):
Karan (nommed Vishal and Meisha)
Meisha (nommed Vishal and Umar)
Nishant (nommed Akasa and Vishal)
Pratik (nommed Jay and Ieshaan)
Shamita (nommed Ieshaan and Vishal)
Simba (nommed Ieshaan and Afsana)
Two notable betrayals - Nishant nominated Akasa and Shamita nominated Vishal.
Out of the 3 nominated - Akasa, Simba, and Vishal - Akasa was least strategic and Vishal was most strategic. Therefore Akasa deserves to lose and she is really playing pretty badly. She should go.
What do you guys think?