Originally posted by: SP2684
I'm glad you think you get to be the judge of @bold, while believing you're not judging my view. As to your quote above - the operate word there was "had" found Abhinav interesting - past tense - not that it matters whether you believe it or not - that is not my goal, simply another instance of you apparently not standing in judgement of yet again - my view.
As to it being a "nice way to not answer anything" - I don't need to be answerable for my view, as I've said umpteen times. And I'm done here - as I said, it was clearly a mistake to engage here.
Well your posts reflect your views. I just said that only. There is no need to react like this for that.😆 I just don't agree with most of your thoughts. So you can take that easily.😊
I know you don't find Abhinav interesting now. I don't even care about it. I only replied because you quoted my post. I read there was "had" and @bold; that's exactly I mean and do. Thats why I ignore your posts most of the time. I simply don't want to get engaged with negativity.
Rest, I don't want to repeat myself. It's a discussion forum and if someone does not agree with you or like your views, and if you quote their post, then that person has all the rights to reply to you. But I think my bad, that I thought discussion is possible with you.