removed

He has very different dictionary than general people.

He is only person for whom Aukat means voice ki aukat🤓......so Baki toh aap khud hi andaz laga lo.

Originally posted by: DaffodilsNew

He has very different dictionary than general people.

He is only person for whom Aukat means voice ki aukat🤓......so Baki toh aap khud hi andaz laga lo.

He never said Aukat means voice ki aukat

He specifically used "awaz ki aukat sambhal ke bat kar" - dont twist words

Definition google karlo & Example hain "Shukla" isko dekhlo, samajh jaoge Arrogance Kya hain.😆

Originally posted by: BoogerDevi

He never said Aukat means voice ki aukat

He specifically used "awaz ki aukat sambhal ke bat kar" - dont twist words

Lol

Awaz and Voice are very different . Sorry my mistake. I didn't know dt they are so different.

And I don't need to use his words. He meant aukat in the actual sense of the word only. But when he got questioned about it a week later......he 'twisted' his own words. Only people who believe everything Sid says blindly can't see how he saved his own ass twisting his own words.

Originally posted by: DaffodilsNew

Lol

Awaz and Voice are very different . Sorry my mistake. I didn't know dt they are so different.

And I don't need to use his words. He meant aukat in the actual sense of the word only. But when he got questioned about it a week later......he 'twisted' his own words. Only people who believe everything Sid says blindly can't see how he saved his own ass twisting his own words.

I am believing what I am seeing and hearing. You can re-watch the whole argument if you wish.

Like I said Koi iske muh pe dictionary maro.

Originally posted by: BoogerDevi

He never said Aukat means voice ki aukat

He specifically used "awaz ki aukat sambhal ke bat kar" - dont twist words

Awaz ki bhi aukat hote hain kya .😂

Originally posted by: BoogerDevi

I am believing what I am seeing and hearing. You can re-watch the whole argument if you wish.

I don't need to rewatch anything. My hearing and eyesight work just fine and I have my own sense of judgement . I don't need anyone's false very well thought of explanation to judge what had happened when it had happened.

I don't understand why Shukla fans think only they have watched the episodes carefully and others haven't. Every Shukla fan has the same argument .....please watch again.

Even if I watch a thousand tyms more.....the only thing dt will change is coniving and sly quotient of Shukla......it might just increase more.

Well it depends on the dictionary one uses - Shukla’s dictionary carries a definition vastly different to the Oxford one. And if one goes by the latter, Shukla hasn’t a clue - I mean, he even thinks awaaz has aukaat (or not) 😳

He’s arrogance and conceit personified - doubt ki toh baat hi nahi hain 😆

Originally posted by: subhs

Awaz ki bhi aukat hote hain kya .😂

Han in Shukla Ji's special dictionary of etiquettes.