Rao Surtan Singh

prvish

@prvish

Inactive

0

Posted: 11 years ago

Quite apart from incorrect timelines, two things on this how seem to have no historical validity:

1. While it is true that many Rajput Kings accepted Moghul sovereignty - mostly after military defeat and a few without going to war at all - history does not have record of any independent Rajput King conspiring with the Mughuls to overthrow another Rajput King.

2. To be fair, there is also no historical evidence to back the portrayal of Akbar conspiring with any Rajput to hold Maharana Pratap hostage.

2

Reply

Quote

timepass

@timepass

Voyager

18

Posted: 11 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: Skepblun

Rao SurTan and Rao SurJan are two different people. The latter was installed at Bundi by Udai Singh as per a book on Maharana Pratap. He was a trusted guy unlike corrupt Rao SurTan.

May be now we will see Pratap give up the oath of not touching weapons...he will fight for Bubdi people and liberate them with Udai Singh's help...the Udai Singh will have control over Bundi...Akabr will get more furious because he lost Bundi

1

Reply

Quote

ami

@bitblue

Dazzler

22

Posted: 11 years ago

#13

.

May be now we will see Pratap give up the oath of not touching weapons...he will fight for Bubdi people and liberate them with Udai Singh's help...the Udai Singh will have control over Bundi...Akabr will get more furious because he lost Bundi

i a m thinking same

Reply

Quote

Ajayanand1976

@Ajayanand1976

Beginner

0

Posted: 11 years ago

#14

Hi,

On the same wikipage "History of Bundi" Rao Surjan's time is written as (1554 - 85) whereas at many places it is written as 1544 - 85.

So may be the timeperiod of 1554 - 85 is correct and it makes perfect timing with the stuff being shown.