why did maya killed the goldfish brutally *MOD NOTE PG-46*

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

441597

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

#151

Originally posted by: kavsy

As per the vedas you can have plants but animal killing is a sin.

People who wrote Vedas didn't know that plants are living creatures.

Quote

Nithunavi

@Nithunavi

Dazzler

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#152

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

People who wrote Vedas didn't know that plants are living creatures.

🤣🤣🤣

What did u just say ?

Lol if they didn't know abt plants then how do u think Ayurveda was born ?

They know abt plants more than todays scientists.

Stop making ridiculous comments like this .

And FYI plants are for eating purpose only. If u have read Bhagavad-Gita u will know how Krishna says to eat satva type of food for man kind.

And that's plants which are of those type not animals.

But now in Kali Yuga man started to ear everything and it has become common but back then ppl used to live on veg.

Consult any doc they will say even plants can give the protein & vitamins that are needed for man's body.

And do u know PETA organisation which is for encouraging ppl to convert to veg even they say veg is enough for man's body.

PS- I didn't wanted to comment here for u but ur comment made me Laugh hard that I had to intervene.

Edited by Nithunavi - 8 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

kavita

@kavitha_r

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#153

Originally posted by: Nithunavi

🤣🤣🤣

What did u just say ?
Lol if they didn't know abt plants then how do u think Ayurveda was born ?
They know abt plants more than todays scientists.
Stop making ridiculous comments like this .

And FYI plants are for eating purpose only. If u have read Bhagavad-Gita u will know how Krishna says to eat satva type of food for man kind.
And that's plants which are of those type not animals.
But now in Kali Yuga man started to ear everything and it has become common but back then ppl used to live on veg.
Consult any doc they will say even plants can give the protein & vitamins that are needed for man's body.
And do u know PETA organisation which is for encouraging ppl to convert to veg even they say veg is enough for man's body.

PS- I didn't wanted to comment here for u but ur comment made me Laugh hard that I had to intervene.

Edited by kavsy - 8 years ago

Quote

Nithunavi

@Nithunavi

Dazzler

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#154

Originally posted by: kavsy

Yes, of course, if you eat animals, you get the sexual feeling & won't have the control over it. Even Sri Sri Ravishankar guruji id educating people about having vegetarian food. God himself allows human beings to have your food from plants. First of all, I find this thread itself is funny and I am commenting here because this is with an intention to find faults in Maya.

Ikr 😆 now a days not getting anything ppl are trying to make posts on ridiculous stuff for the sake of bashing. 😆

Quote

Japrilforever

@Japrilforever

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#155

Originally posted by: kavsy

Yes, of course, if you eat animals, you get the sexual feeling & won't have the control over it. Even Sri Sri Ravishankar guruji is educating people about having vegetarian food. God himself allows human beings to have your food from plants. First of all, I find this thread itself is funny and I am commenting here because this is with an intention to find faults in Maya. There is one youtube video in which there is a debate on veg vs nonveg between Ravishankar & Jahangir (or whoever). You will get to know if you watch that video.

WHAT???? 😲

Quote

Japrilforever

@Japrilforever

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#156

@kavsy, seriously tell me...From where do u get such awesome ideas? 😆

So according to u, ppl are vegetarians because eating nonveg gives them a sexual feeling? Agar aisa hota toh why have sex for pleasure? Everyone can just eat meat n be happy 😆

Edited by lumos_31 - 8 years ago

Quote

Kaushitaki

@Penkie06

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#157

Originally posted by: sammy17

To a person in denial, the truth always seems like crap, now doesn't it?

Didn't actually mean to quote this. wanted to quote your original post Sammy but I just can't get to finding it among so many things being quoted over all these pages coz I'm lazy. Found this on the 19th pg so copying it.

I don't really understand why people have this typical mentality in tv shows. Because if our favourite star at the movies is playing a villain, do we really justify them by hook or by crook? That's so weird!

Because yes of course what is wrong, IS WRONG MAN!

Yes vandana throwing garbage on someone's head is wrong and I myself had criticised that.

Yes Saanjh's clinging onto arjun in the initial episodes with Samay seemed wrong to me and I criticised that.

But never in any way will you see them say that yes maya was wrong. They'll any way just anyway try to justify her. Yes great! Tremendous lawyer instincts and I appreciate that but this really isn't a Court of Law is it, or maya their client is she?

I appreciate your having an inclination towards a particular, or as they say more real life character, but do such tremendous manipulators really exist? And if yes, why can't a mostly sane soul like saanjh exist too?

I myself have never used the word "mahaan" for anyone in the show because no one can be Mahaan! They do that on one hand, and call her a s***, b**** and what not! Do they even know what a homewrecker means? A person who intentionally breaks a home. I mean where from they get such tremendous ideas man? Even they create episodes in their minds where saanjh is homewrecking.

Leave alone that, I am just stunned at some of the comments in this particular post. I don't know whether to laugh or cry out aloud!

I bet maya has never ever been bad mouthed, used slangs against by any even die hard saanjh fans here. But look at the other way round! Just look at their ways of behaving.

Maya has been clearly shown to manipulate, we can see, my mom can see too ( a daily viewer) but they can't. Because they're Gandharis, black cloth tied round their eyes.

Saanjh when wrong is criticised clearly. I can repost my own posts doing that. I just wish they could repost any single time they criticised Maya, forgetting the advice they give to us...'no one is perfect. ' Why not dearies? Maya Mehrotra is the epitome of PERFECTION. ISN'T SHE?

Quote

annihilation

@annihilation

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#158

I'm sorry but I'm compelled to take a note of this.

So basically, eating non veg causes people to get aroused leading them to have zero control over it and/or the person consuming non veg receives sexual pleasure.

Okay, noted. Indeed, enlightening.

Quote

priyanka...

@priyanka...

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

#159

Originally posted by: .annihilation.
I'm sorry but I'm compelled to take a note of this.

So basically, eating non veg causes people to get aroused leading them to have zero control over it and/or the person consuming non veg receives sexual pleasure.

Okay, noted. Indeed, enlightening.

😆 LOL

Quote

Rashmi

@Intuitive

Sparkler

Posted: 8 years ago

#160

I don't get the point of having a Veg V/s Non-Veg debate. It is a completely different issue from what Maya did.

Aside from ethics of killing of fun, it shows how she depends on physical protection. She loved Arjun, because physically he took on Ashwin. She wants her object of obsession, Arjun always physically known and seen by her. In the same way, she wanted those fishes dead. She believes that emotional bondage comes from physical bondage. Somewhere, in that process she almost jails people, and keeps hurting them emotionally through physical obsession.

https://books.google.de/books?id=z3ksBrWoZm0C&pg=PA2&redir_esc=y&hl=de#v=onepage&q&f=false

Check the above link. It shows the lifestyle during Rig Vedic Period. Also, this is just one of the evidences and theory, because you cannot be sure of the exact things in the Vedic Period.

Consumption of meat was common. It depended on the body pattern of the person. However, Vegeterianism was recommended, but at the same time having Non-Veg was a concession. It is not like you can have non-veg everyday, it was more like a concession. If your body pattern didn't support Vegeterianism it was fine.

Again, I advocate none of these. Just saying, there are many theories regarding Non-veg in Vedas. And regarding Sattva food recommendation, it is to purify the mind and intellect. But, we shouldn't forget that everything is needed in a balance in this nature. All the three Sattva, Rajas and Tamas food are needed in right proportion.

Personally I believe we should reduce meat consumption, because it requires too much of water unlike other foods and in this age where water is scare, it should be reduced. But there is no need to abandon it.