Barrister Babu Episode Discussion Thread - Page 4

Originally posted by: Janu.301017

Waise how can marriage happen in the first place?

Bcz law already passed..so, Ani can bring police to stop it...

But TM is creating misunderstandings btw Ani and bonditha...atleast bonditha should listen to Ani what he is saying...

Good that she asked about age..

Hope they clear misunderstandings...and go further in the story...

Sumati kasi maa he yaar...she doesn't stand up for her daughter..she always leave her in the middle of the road alone to face the situations...

Originally posted by: Janu.301017

Waise how can marriage happen in the first place?

Bcz law already passed..so, Ani can bring police to stop it...

But TM is creating misunderstandings btw Ani and bonditha...atleast bonditha should listen to Ani what he is saying...

Good that she asked about age..

Hope they clear misunderstandings...and go further in the story...

Sumati kasi maa he yaar...she doesn't stand up for her daughter..she always leave her in the middle of the road alone to face the situations...

Hi, so this is my personal opinion rather my understanding of the era n situation..

Considering the era where social reforms n its opposition were at peak, social beliefs n laws didn't go hand in hand.. rather they bound to be in inverse direction many times..

If we can take the case of Bondita, yes her any new marriage at this stage cannot be legal ( assuming bon is yet to attain the age, we are not clear about the qualifying age in BB land, Caz in actual history such law was passed much later and the age was much lesser than current qualifying age) . If she gets married with all ritual society will accept them as husband and wife.. society won't go for legal provision... Marriage and marital life is matter of social pattern n not of law according to them..

On the contrary, Ani- Bon previous marriage may be still legal.

1. Legaly declaring prevalent marriage as 'void-ab-initio' on passing of new law is nonsensical... Judiciary system shoulders big responsibility and cannot just pass retrospective laws..

2. They did not give us any clear idea if even divorce law had been passed along with child marriage in their land.. and ani sought a divorce under it..

But in social beliefs their marriage is definitely no more valid with ulte phere( again too dramatic n not realistic)

At the end no need to think this or about any logic, Caz they are keeping it ambiguous only without any logic.. if they want to show a marriage they can show it any way and if not they won't...

Even this time Ani fails to understand that he should be part of that system where he wants to bring reforms... Being married Rudhita could have very influential stand in society against kuprathas...

I should stop here its too long already 🙆 sorry for long post

Originally posted by: Mugkale

Hi, so this is my personal opinion rather my understanding of the era n situation..

Considering the era where social reforms n its opposition were at peak, social beliefs n laws didn't go hand in hand.. rather they bound to be in inverse direction many times..

If we can take the case of Bondita, yes her any new marriage at this stage cannot be legal ( assuming bon is yet to attain the age, we are not clear about the qualifying age in BB land, Caz in actual history such law was passed much later and the age was much lesser than current qualifying age) . If she gets married with all ritual society will accept them as husband and wife.. society won't go for legal provision... Marriage and martial life is matter of social pattern n not of law according to them..

On the contrary, Ani- Bon previous marriage may be still legal.

1. Legaly declaring prevalent marriage as 'void-ab-initio' on passing of new law is nonsensical... Judiciary system shoulders big responsibility and cannot just pass retrospective laws..

2. They did not give us any clear idea if even divorce law had been passed along with child marriage in their land.. and ani seeked a divorce under it..

But in social beliefs their marriage is definitely no more valid with ulte phere( again too dramatic n not realistic)

At the end no need to think this or about any logic, Caz they are keeping it ambiguous only without any logic.. if they want to show a marriage they can show it any way and if not they won't...

Even this time Ani fails to understand that he should be part of that system where he wants to bring reforms... Being married Rudhita could have very influential stand in society against kuprathas...

I should stop here its too long already 🙆 sorry for long post

Originally posted by: Mugkale

Hi, so this is my personal opinion rather my understanding of the era n situation..

Considering the era where social reforms n its opposition were at peak, social beliefs n laws didn't go hand in hand.. rather they bound to be in inverse direction many times..

If we can take the case of Bondita, yes her any new marriage at this stage cannot be legal ( assuming bon is yet to attain the age, we are not clear about the qualifying age in BB land, Caz in actual history such law was passed much later and the age was much lesser than current qualifying age) . If she gets married with all ritual society will accept them as husband and wife.. society won't go for legal provision... Marriage and martial life is matter of social pattern n not of law according to them..

On the contrary, Ani- Bon previous marriage may be still legal.

1. Legaly declaring prevalent marriage as 'void-ab-initio' on passing of new law is nonsensical... Judiciary system shoulders big responsibility and cannot just pass retrospective laws..

2. They did not give us any clear idea if even divorce law had been passed along with child marriage in their land.. and ani seeked a divorce under it..

But in social beliefs their marriage is definitely no more valid with ulte phere( again too dramatic n not realistic)

At the end no need to think this or about any logic, Caz they are keeping it ambiguous only without any logic.. if they want to show a marriage they can show it any way and if not they won't...

Even this time Ani fails to understand that he should be part of that system where he wants to bring reforms... Being married Rudhita could have very influential stand in society against kuprathas...

I should stop here its too long already 🙆 sorry for long post

Exactly Mugs....nicely described....have you studied Law?

Just like that asked.....as legal terms are used in your post

Originally posted by: Mugkale

Hi, so this is my personal opinion rather my understanding of the era n situation..

Considering the era where social reforms n its opposition were at peak, social beliefs n laws didn't go hand in hand.. rather they bound to be in inverse direction many times..

If we can take the case of Bondita, yes her any new marriage at this stage cannot be legal ( assuming bon is yet to attain the age, we are not clear about the qualifying age in BB land, Caz in actual history such law was passed much later and the age was much lesser than current qualifying age) . If she gets married with all ritual society will accept them as husband and wife.. society won't go for legal provision... Marriage and martial life is matter of social pattern n not of law according to them..

On the contrary, Ani- Bon previous marriage may be still legal.

1. Legaly declaring prevalent marriage as 'void-ab-initio' on passing of new law is nonsensical... Judiciary system shoulders big responsibility and cannot just pass retrospective laws..

2. They did not give us any clear idea if even divorce law had been passed along with child marriage in their land.. and ani seeked a divorce under it..

But in social beliefs their marriage is definitely no more valid with ulte phere( again too dramatic n not realistic)

At the end no need to think this or about any logic, Caz they are keeping it ambiguous only without any logic.. if they want to show a marriage they can show it any way and if not they won't...

Even this time Ani fails to understand that he should be part of that system where he wants to bring reforms... Being married Rudhita could have very influential stand in society against kuprathas...

I should stop here its too long already 🙆 sorry for long post

So nicely said. Thakuma planning for Bon's marriage is a proof that the law hasn't come in effect and people like Thakuma are still planning for child marriage. Then? Where is the social reform? How come ARC brought a change in the society, as makers wanted to show? The show is of social genre, isn't social reforms be the priority? Where is the change in society? Or do we have to think that the annulment of ONLY Ani-Bon's marriage was just to bring 'spice' to the show? Or to portray this sakha-sakhi crap? Or to pave way for this complete wrongly handled Thakuma track? What was the aim of the child-marriage abolishment track? 😕

Originally posted by: vishalsangeeta

Exactly....jab TM was introduced....Stage of the story was set so beautifully ...this could have been an excellent realization track....but pura kachra kar ke revenge track bana diya

Though episode main kuchh scenes hote hain rejoice karne ke liye...like Tapur bon cutiepie scene....Aurrist scene at the end.....but mainly mujhe continuity ki kami lagti hain.....aisa lagta hain jaise randomly scenes shoot karke baad mein ye log sochte hain ki scene ko kahan dala jaye....😭

Waiting ki kuchh dhamal ho but bahut badi hope nahin hain......

Tapur-Bon scenes are a relief. I love this girl Tapur, her voice still has the baby sound in it, and the way she speaks is soo adorable and full of innocence. ❤️ Reminds me of my baby Bon

Fully agreed Sangeeta. The episodes are not in continuation. There is no flow. What a miserable disappointment to this track holding so much potential 😵 Thinking about the ending makes me more sad 😭

Originally posted by: Indira12

So nicely said. Thakuma planning for Bon's marriage is a proof that the law hasn't come in effect and people like Thakuma are still planning for child marriage. Then? Where is the social reform? How come ARC brought a change in the society, as makers wanted to show? The show is of social genre, isn't social reforms be the priority? Where is the change in society? Or do we have to think that the annulment of ONLY Ani-Bon's marriage was just to bring 'spice' to the show? Or to portray this sakha-sakhi crap? Or to pave way for this complete wrongly handled Thakuma track? What was the aim of the child-marriage abolishment track? 😕

These are the question even boggling everyone here.....what was the need of child marriage annulment law track....why rudhita relationship was sacrificed.....do makers have shown any post effect like people have taken their example....some marriages are stopped....they shown only -ive effect like Bon life was in danger...

The way Ani is pleading to TM to stop the marriage and do not ruin Bon's life.....comeon...you are a barrister....you brought this much needed law..( by just filing a petition)..atleast show some power here which is your subject matter..🤢 such a strong subject....could have created a wonder....dhamaka on ITV ....it needed a diffrent treatment and execution.....but they ruined it all and made it a typical revenge game😭 the viewers are not typical TRP aunties here....they are much educated to digest any such diffrent issue and social reform track...

TM was shown strict but protective for her family at initial stage.....but she is ready to let Bon go to a family not related to her if she gets her revenge....it is so cringy n unrealistic😡

Enough of my ranting....💔

Originally posted by: Indira12

So nicely said. Thakuma planning for Bon's marriage is a proof that the law hasn't come in effect and people like Thakuma are still planning for child marriage. Then? Where is the social reform? How come ARC brought a change in the society, as makers wanted to show? The show is of social genre, isn't social reforms be the priority? Where is the change in society? Or do we have to think that the annulment of ONLY Ani-Bon's marriage was just to bring 'spice' to the show? Or to portray this sakha-sakhi crap? Or to pave way for this complete wrongly handled Thakuma track? What was the aim of the child-marriage abolishment track? 😕

Ty...exactly yaar, law pass karane se kya hota hai.. people need to understand the gravity... Logonko samzana jaruri hai... Khudai shadi todkar kuchh nai sabit kar paye ye abtak.... bus ek baat samzi ke sabne shadi todne ki prerana le li ani se to kitani badi samsya khadi ho jayegi samaj me.. un ladikiyon ke bhavishya ko lekar... Par ye to makers manege nai... Ani ka realisation dikhayenge nai...

UL: I will select all of the above.. n still could not spiced up ...

Originally posted by: vishalsangeeta

Exactly Mugs....nicely described....have you studied Law?

Just like that asked.....as legal terms are used in your post

No dear law was not my primary subject... But yes thode laws padhe as a part of syllabus..

Originally posted by: Mugkale

No dear law was not my primary subject... But yes thode laws padhe as a part of syllabus..

Ok.....so I wasn't totally wrong🤣