Khalrika agree with u but what reaction did the CVs want? I'm confused. 😕Originally posted by: Khalrika
<font color="#990000"><font size="2">Guys, please don't throw chappals at me.
This is my input:
DM wanted to say something to Santu when he sees her sitting in her room all wet. It was the same look he gave her near the tulsi plant when that fake Subhi appeared on the day of the pooja and he went inside with her.
If Rudr is capable of cornering Santu in a room he is sick. I wouldn't mind it if DM has said the cruel things to Santu in front of everyone just to catch the guy. If he needs to be handed over to the police then DM needs proof. Without proof people like Rudr cannot be stopped. Also, people like Rudr will find another woman wherever they go and try to rape them. If Rudr needs to be stopped then DM has to pretend that he suspects Santu. If DM is doing this for a greater good (protecting other women in the future) then I am with him. However if the fruitcakes show some other track then shame on the CVs. What did DM do? RR is just doing whatever Kekta and her fruitcakes are telling him to do guys. Don't bash DM; bash the CVs. 😆
This is the reaction the CVs 😡 wanted from u guys and they have got it.
</font></font>