@ Sushmita. Since nothing was shown why assume that J didn't do enough? Why were fingers being pointed at J the kakusa and the Vidhayaksa?
Why is J or any other character expected to do "more", and Anandi is excused for not even doing the basics?
------------
Lot of us were criticising directors for poorly ending Anandi's character and for unnecessarily making the kids orphans.
People are disappointed bse no one expected this kind of lame fate for Anandi and her kids.
We are not blaming Anandi for the way she died but for what she couldn't do enough while she was alive, so as to secure her kids future?
Now lets go back to what was shown.
Jagya searched for Anandi and kids and upon not finding them he assumed they were dead. This was clearly shown.
Have they shown Anandi and kids trying to contact J but failing? No - so why assume that they must have called but he couldn't be contacted.
Since it is not shown it is safe to assume it never happened. Anandi was not shown contacting J or directing someone to contact J, so we are simply pointing why was she wasting time giving gyan instead of ensuring that Jagya is on his way to pick up kids.
It is as simple as that.
And why shouldn't J assume that these people have died. Bse if they were any alive, wouldn't they contact him or come back home?