Finally .... The time has come DT NOTE pg 2 - Page 10

what ananndi did what jagya did digging the past has now no meaning, point is child's upbringing...and that will be best done with her own people ...mangala has no right legally and now morally because she is selfish and she was snatching the child's rights for her own satisfaction.

Mangala is selfish - but Anandi and Nimboli are more selfish. It is like you do my work and then get lost or rather be punished.

Originally posted by: Maharaani

what ananndi did what jagya did digging the past has now no meaning, point is child's upbringing...and that will be best done with her own people ...mangala has no right legally and now morally because she is selfish and she was snatching the child's rights for her own satisfaction.

Why don't you pick on those who actually digged the past and brought up the topic?

They did not punish her...she was punished for her own sins...the child herslef knew who is using her and who is silently loving her

Originally posted by: Missesha

Who is saying the child's anger is not justified. It is her hatred which is not.

If the child was only angry and hurt (which is a natural behaviour), she would have chosen to go with Anandi but never said "kabhi naa dekhni teesa ki surat" - This was hatred, which is not justified, because Nandini owes her 12 years of safe life to Mangala. And she knows what M did for her.

This Nandini was ready to save Akheraj, but hates Mangala??

And Anandi took no second in endorsing N's hatred for M. It suited her after all.

If Anandi let M go scott free, it is because she figured out that N hates M and won't be a threat anymore. Had N showed softness towards M even after all this, who knows Anandi would not have stopped police from taking M

Just as she never pushed J into jail, because by the time she figured out her rights as BV, she had already known how nice Singhs were to her, and how they were going to support her, so she looked out for positive interests / better gains.

Nimboli has not been told the other side of story - and her reaction is too harsh given that she owes her life to someone.

Jagya anandi think mangala a kidnapper because mangala herself made them think so by again attempt to taking nandini away.

It is wrong to take away other daughter witbout permission of real parents and when intension is bad that not wanting daughter to meet her real mother then it is absolutely wrong .

Even if one proves Anandi wrong, one thing is sure as hell, that Mangala cannot get the custody of Nandini, there is Jagya and Dadi Sa, if not, let Shekhars take the custody as they are fully capable of giving the children brightest future, where as Mangala in no single way can do that, not only she is utterly incapable of bringing up the children happily and give them a good future...she is also dangerous and bad for them/her.

Originally posted by: Missesha

Who is saying the child's anger is not justified. It is her hatred which is not.

If the child was only angry and hurt (which is a natural behaviour), she would have chosen to go with Anandi but never said "kabhi naa dekhni teesa ki surat" - This was hatred, which is not justified, because Nandini owes her 12 years of safe life to Mangala. And she knows what M did for her.

This Nandini was ready to save Akheraj, but hates Mangala??

And Anandi took no second in endorsing N's hatred for M. It suited her after all.

If Anandi let M go scott free, it is because she figured out that N hates M and won't be a threat anymore. Had N showed softness towards M even after all this, who knows Anandi would not have stopped police from taking M

Just as she never pushed J into jail, because by the time she figured out her rights as BV, she had already known how nice Singhs were to her, and how they were going to support her, so she looked out for positive interests / better gains.

@ Missesha

I agree that Nimboli's anger is justified . But I remember how DB was a dangerous woman. She used to torture Amol ,a disabled child. Amol had every right to be angry. But Anandi made Amol to apologise to DB even though he wasn't at fault . No matter what ,Mangala is the woman who saved Nimboli's life. If Anandi is really principled she should ( I will repeat your words)have corrected N saying that whatever the case may be she shouldn't disrespect teesa so much, after all teesa did care for her..Instead Anandi endorsed Nimboli's hatred.
Why different rules on a case-by-case basis? Is it because DB is a family or is it because Amol was just an adopted child even though he was abused ? To Nimboli it has not been said that she should recpect all good things Mangala did for her, most of all to be grateful for saving her life but Amol was taught to bow down to his abuser.