New flavour of BV - Page 5

I am surprised that how some Anandi supporters write every possible illogical crap on Jagya and Ganga when someone even calls their favorite sati savitri they start attacking the member 🤢

@Alchemist, thanks. I have always enjoyed interacting with you. I withdrew from the forum because it had become too self-righteous and too intolerant of even the slightest dissent. But withdrawing also means ceding space to the majority view.

I came in to say that there can be other opinions on BV and some viewers may be watching It from an entirely different prism.

As for my own opinion, I concede that I started with tremendous prejudice towards BV 2. I thought the new family was horrendous and I still find them horrendous. But the superlative acting, the near-perfect cast and a riveting story have made me watch it, almost against my will.

At least I'm willing to concede that I made an error of judgement with respect to BV2.

Rural regressive tracks are essence of bv2,it is a serious art film. Social show. Not relieving entertainment.
One burning issue is child molestation and bv can show that nicely through.nimbuli n.kundan.recently there was a case of 16 years old boy raped a 11,years old girl.
And bv has to tackle these issues through its bold social message.

Originally posted by: rohini55

@Alchemist, thanks. I have always enjoyed interacting with you. I withdrew from the forum because it had become too self-righteous and too intolerant of even the slightest dissent. But withdrawing also means ceding space to the majority view.

I came in to say that there can be other opinions on BV and some viewers may be watching It from an entirely different prism.

As for my own opinion, I concede that I started with tremendous prejudice towards BV 2. I thought the new family was horrendous and I still find them horrendous. But the superlative acting, the near-perfect cast and a riveting story have made me watch it, almost against my will.

At least I'm willing to concede that I made an error of judgement with respect to BV2.

Nice to see you again Pooja.😊

Disagreeing with a member's opinion about a scene/character amounts to trying to suppressing the member's voice ????

Nobody said disagreeing with a member's opinion is suppressing the voice. But what happened in some of the threads was certainly suppressing the voice. Justifying creatives by fan groups about anything related to their favorite is fine - but pointing out the obvious mistakes by creatives is nit-picking?

I also disagree with many views and some thick skin helped me to get through.😉

When the CVs convey the point they wanted to convey through a partcicular scene and audience get what they are trying to say through the scene that obviously mean that the CVs have succeeded in communicating with the viewers.

None of the unmarried girl in BV wore mang tika, bichuva or pallu. Be it Anandi, Ganga, Gahna, various girls in Jaitsar school etc. Anandi, Ganga and Nimboli continued to wear it after their marriage broke - it does not mean that this is the norm - it only means that creatives dont want to change the "look". At least people of north India are not confused what ornaments symbolise marriage because they themselves follow these norms. Again in Rajasthan, UP, Bihar, MP etc. there is no mangalsutra - married women dont wear mangalsutra there. Now some wear it for fashion, just like mang tika sometimes is worn by unmarried girls during functions (only in cities, in villages they follow tradition more strictly and unmarried girls cant dare to wear such ornaments meant for married ladies).