Abhi's little prank - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

64

Views

5.6k

Users

11

Likes

180

Frequent Posters

GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#11
Dsa made Anandi part of her family way back when they were kids and when she decided to do Jagya's second marriage with Gudiya. At that time itself she said that Anandi will always be part of the family if not as a bahu then as a beti.
Bhairon and Sumi did always consider her as a beti.It is just that thye haven't taken legal steps.

They considered her as a family and gave her same legal rights as Suguna when they distributed property.

Anandi had been living there as Dadisa's grand daughter.

On one hand people say how regressive that Anandi is staying with ex sasuralwale and blah blah

But what kind of sasural wale get their bahu divorced from their own darling son because of infidelity and get her married to a good man and then look after her and her children when the second husband dies?

Which sasural with regressive mentality will do that?

This is a story of a relationship between the old lady and young girl which went far and beyond traditions and I think they are more progressive than the viewers who just see them from their own prism and split hairs.

Forming bonds which are way beyond traditions based entirely on inter personal equations.Isn't that a sign of progressiveness?

Yes I would like Anandi to move out of BH not because it is her ex sasural - but her child needs more space and healthier environment to grow and spread his wings .He shouldn't be spending his whole time and energy dealing with some pranks played by a kid who is jealous insecure and feels he is inferior to him.If Shivam is made to live there even his periphery of vision will become narrow and his life will be confined to protecting himself from the pranks or trying to get back at the other boy.
SPuja thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#12
It is personal choice. I do not see an ex-wife as family of her ex-husband and his current wife. Serial me to kuch bhi dikha dete hai, personally, I do not just accept all that they show - a lot of things they show are unacceptable in normal life. Don't know if Bhairo had his own property or he transferred his share in BH to Anandi. Having property right does not make anyone family. People can give share of property to anybody they like but that does not mean it will make them family.
leavesandwaves thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: SPuja

It is personal choice. I do not see an ex-wife as family of her ex-husband and his current wife. Serial me to kuch bhi dikha dete hai, personally, I do not just accept all that they show - a lot of things they show are unacceptable in normal life. Don't know if Bhairo had his own property or he transferred his share in BH to Anandi. Having property right does not make anyone family. People can give share of property to anybody they like but that does not mean it will make them family.



Even dadisa would have given all her property to anandi.

There is a legal sense and there is something more than legal.

Even family cant be real family sometimes. A woman may conceive a child from a lover instead of legal husband and pretend otherwise.

You may not accept anandi as family of BH but I acept her as their family.


SPuja thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#14
Again personal choice - some will accept what they show - some will not. I did not even accept Ganaga as family until she married J. I do not find it logical that people accept someone as family just because the head of the family thinks so. Like I may think my friend as family, but that will not make her a family for my kids or husband or that other people should accept that she is my family.
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#15
What is normal?
Waht may be normal to me may not be normal to others.

There is conventional and there is unconventional.

Normal is all about giving precedence to bonds that have formed over sharing moments of joy and sorrow over to the bonds that are a result of traditions and blood relations.
So many times it happens in real life too.The people whom we work with and the friends who have been with us through thick and thin become much closer to us over our blood relations and family members especially when we live far away from family.

Anandi and Dsa relationship may be unconventional but by no means abnormal.

Just because it is unconventional that doesn't make it far from normal.
Edited by aparnauma - 10 years ago
leavesandwaves thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: SPuja

Again personal choice - some will accept what they show - some will not. I did not even accept Ganaga as family until she married J. I do not find it logical that people accept someone as family just because the head of the family thinks so. Like I may think my friend as family, but that will not make her a family for my kids or husband or that other people should accept that she is my family.



At that time Ganga was not married to Jagya while Anandi was married to Jagya for a long time.
Edited by leavesandwaves - 10 years ago
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#17
If we go by legal issues and traditions - then Jagya Gauri marriage is neither legal nor is it valid according to the traditions.
So how is that a normal relationship? I have seen people supporting this relationship which society doesn't accept traditions do not accept Hindu law doesn't accept neither is it acceptable by the law of the land

People didn't find problems over J chosing to live with Gauri and Gauri accepting that situation was that normal?
That relationship caused so much destruction all around.
SPuja thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#18

"So many times it happens in real life too.The people whom we work with and the friends who have been with us through thick and thin become much closer to us over our blood relations and family members especially when we live far away from family."


@bold - that is what I'm saying. These people may be closer than real family - but that will not make them family to live together or will make other people to accept that they are family. My office friend may be more than my real sister, but for interaction with my husband/other family members/neighbours - the real sister is family and my friend is just friend. In Anandi's case, it is all the more odd because she is the ex-wife. In her place someone else - say Phooli would not look odd. And again it is personal choice - I'm writing what I think - naturally, other people may think otherwise. A lot of time they show things that are hard to accept and I write what I think.
SPuja thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#19

J-G marriage was no marriage at all. It was plain cheating and a live-in relationship. Even the court marriage could be nullified because the certificate was got made by hiding truth. People who supported J-G relationship had their own personal choice (may be liking the pair). Personally, I did not accept that Gauri was a wife - but I did expected J to close the relationship if he was indeed redeemed. And Singhs also to tell the truth about J-G relationship when they were searching a bride for J. A lot of things the serial has shown are beyond my comprehension - that deep insight may be missing in me.
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#20
I don't see why Singhs should accept Gauri as J's wife or as his choice in the first place.
Later on when they were searching for marriage alliances - they should have disclosed it.They were wrong not to disclose about Gauri.

Gauri was Jagya's problem - it is he should have closed the relationship properly. Why should his parents be faulted if he didn't close that relationship in a proper manner?If I remember right there were N number of posts finding fault with Anandi and Singhs for not insisting on J closing his relationship with G in a proper manner.

They knew what kind of person Gauri was way before Jagya got to know about her manipulative nature yet they didn't interfere in their relationship.Gauri's behaviour with Singhs and Anandi was totally unacceptable.Yet they never told him about her behaviour towards them simply because they felt that their son is happy with her and let them be.

If J dumped her and came back well good for them.They were right and he was wrong.They cared for Gauri a lot more than Gauri cared for them.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".