Abhi's little prank - Page 5

Originally posted by: SPuja

Balika Vadhu did not show bal-vivah wrong. Bhairo- Sumitra had a blissful relationship, even in Anandi's generation - there are normal relationships like Lal Singh's, Phooli and Sugna got widowed - that can happen even in adult marriage too, Rani was abandoned - that also happens in adult marriages too. Anandi remained with less education and was made to do household works - it was more due to DS's rigid frame of mind (and her parent's hurry to do gauna) and less due to bal-vivah. Generally, in bal-vivah girls remain with their parents and go to sasural after gauna, which takes place a lot later.

Even after marriage in adult stage - they show Anandi returning to Singhs is just a little short of glorification of bal-vivah. Even a glamorous, bubbly Nimboli does not make impression that she is suffering. And before anybody assume that I want to see torture - I make it clear - I do not want to see torture - but make the tortured girl look and behave like a tortured girl. Otherwise it will be same feeling which emerged when Rasika was weeping in front of Shiv telling about her torture...

Rasika was an adult while Nandini is too young. We have seen how roughly Harki and her husband handled a small crying infant. Anandi was brought into BH with her parents consent and blesssings and Nandini was not. Rasika was clever in that she convinced Shiv about her torture and sob story. Only the viewers could see her deceit.
As you said, Bal Vivah can work in some cases but the consequences like early motherhood can be disastrous.

I gave rasika's example because she looked fake and was indeed fake. Here, Nandini's torture is reality - but the way she looks and behave - the torture story looks fake. They cannot ditch glamour. A tortured child will not look and behave like Nandini. If she was indeed beaten up (like they did show with burning log) - her body would be filled with scars and she would be scared in front of her in-laws. If Kundan was indeed so rough (as he was shown during holi) she would not have dared playing pranks on him. If Nandini was doing all the household works right from childhood - she was not roaming freely for first few episodes. I am just pointing out the dichotomy in what they preach/want us to believe and what they show. Compare this with little Ichcha - she did look like a servant's daughter or Chakor ( seen her only in ads as I deliberately do not watch any new serial because I know that they will spoil the story after some time) who looks believable.

Originally posted by: SPuja

I gave rasika's example because she looked fake and was indeed fake. Here, Nandini's torture is reality - but the way she looks and behave - the torture story looks fake. They cannot ditch glamour. A tortured child will not look and behave like Nandini. If she was indeed beaten up (like they did show with burning log) - her body would be filled with scars and she would be scared in front of her in-laws. If Kundan was indeed so rough (as he was shown during holi) she would not have dared playing pranks on him. If Nandini was doing all the household works right from childhood - she was not roaming freely for first few episodes. I am just pointing out the dichotomy in what they preach/want us to believe and what they show. Compare this with little Ichcha - she did look like a servant's daughter or Chakor ( seen her only in ads as I deliberately do not watch any new serial because I know that they will spoil the story after some time) who looks believable.

Maybe they want to present a different type other than the usual types. A chirpy girl who will not allow herself to become a sad girl. If it is physical torture only occasionally, it is believable. I watched Uttaran only due to child Ichcha and I dont feel like watching Chakor story.

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

Maybe they want to present a different type other than the usual types. A chirpy girl who will not allow herself to become a sad girl. If it is physical torture only occasionally, it is believable. I watched Uttaran only due to child Ichcha and I dont feel like watching Chakor story.

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

Maybe they want to present a different type other than the usual types. A chirpy girl who will not allow herself to become a sad girl. If it is physical torture only occasionally, it is believable. I watched Uttaran only due to child Ichcha and I dont feel like watching Chakor story.

So, we are supposed to believe that there are children who are not scared of their tormentors even though they are beaten up mercilessly. But do such children also have some magic formula that make them free of any scars of torture? How do such children find time to do make up, when they are not supposed to get even enough sleep and were made to do work instead of sleeping?

I only hope that they will not turn Anandi into Damini,. Jagya into Jogi thakur, Shivam into Ichcha, Abhi into Tapasya.
Changing genders!
Abhi leaving Shivam was like Tapasya leaving Ichcha at the outing. Are they copy pasting with some gender change?

Anani met singhs : becoz she wax to marry their son jagya

Originally posted by: SPuja

So, we are supposed to believe that there are children who are not scared of their tormentors even though they are beaten up mercilessly. But do such children also have some magic formula that make them free of any scars of torture? How do such children find time to do make up, when they are not supposed to get even enough sleep and were made to do work instead of sleeping?

And also working without eating.😉

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

I only hope that they will not turn Anandi into Damini,. Jagya into Jogi thakur, Shivam into Ichcha, Abhi into Tapasya.
Changing genders!
Abhi leaving Shivam was like Tapasya leaving Ichcha at the outing. Are they copy pasting with some gender change?