No evidence against Shiv - Page 2

Originally posted by: rohini55

The PM report would show Narendra was hit on the head.

Yesterday the defence lawyer did not ask Rasika how she followed him. Which vehicle did she take?,

No one has tried to find out the whereabouts of the kerosene can. If he emptied it on himself outside Shiv's office and thereafter died, it should have been found in the vicinity.

If he emptied it on himself earlier, where did he do it? In the auto?

Where is the auto driver? If there is no auto driver, and no auto, how did he reach there?

That's what he didn't ask. When did Rasika actually arrive on the scene?

I still don't understand why the post mortem details were not presented in the court and why those details are not debated upon

Just posted this another thread..thought I will take it here ...😆

Originally posted by: adi2512

Just posted this another thread..thought I will take it here ...😆

Now, I'am seriously having doubts, if any post mortem was done at all or No 😕 -------

I do not have any knowledge reg this, can any one tell me, if it is a must and should requirement in such cases ?

I guess it is...b'coz a Police Inspector was indeed present in the hospital @ the time of NG's death, and when R was screaming that Shiv is responsible for his death...😕

Also, Aparna, I would like to know, if NG's burnt body would have been a hindrance to notice the rope marks on wrists etc.,

But the blow to his head should not have been o/looked since it would have affected his skull ? 😕

But was postmortem report discussed in court either by prosecution or defense?

All the points discussed here are logical questions..

But after watching today's episode, I am not sure if CVs are ignoring it for drama's case, or is there really anything that is stopping police from doing their work

Though it would be too much to expect from CVs if they show police is helpless to some extent due to some influences, it would make an interesting track if they show it that way.

Originally posted by: Russhme22

All the points discussed here are logical questions..

But after watching today's episode, I am not sure if CVs are ignoring it for drama's case, or is there really anything that is stopping police from doing their work

Though it would be too much to expect from CVs if they show police is helpless to some extent due to some influences, it would make an interesting track if they show it that way.

Cvs can be excused some of their bloopers if they can show that the police deliberately did not investigate the case properly. That will explain why they slipped up on forensics.

But why didn't the hospital do a PM?

And what stopped vivek kabra from grilling rasika? That was within his control.

Today A committed a stupid blunder by asking about the bag. Now Rasika will not use the bag.

TFS...i have been thinking the same about this case...actually i have never seen the 'burden of proof' rule been applied on any case shown in t.v serials...everytime someone or the other brings the proof and the case is solved...in Rasika's molestation case Shiv may have to prove that he did not molest Rasika as the burden of proof here lies on the accussed but in other criminal offences it's Rasika who has to prove that truth...besides it's not even a murder case...Shiv is liable for abetment of suicide becoz according to Rasika it's becoz of Shiv that Narendra was forced to commit suicide...everywhere in news it's written that Shiv will be accussed of murder !

Russhmee the question then arises: If the Udaipur police is so corrupt, how did Shiv not know about it?

He is their overall boss. The administration is under him.

Shiv doesn't have to be cunning and corrupt like Brajesh but surely he should have contacts across the district and know what is happening under his own watch.