Two unacceptable developments

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Monamie

@monamie111

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

#21

@TM...great post and i agree with u!...

i am not sure what the cctv case u r discussing here...i think i have missed something..is the cctv camera is missing from shiv's office? shiv's offie had cctv cameras? 😕

anandi's investigation also not like an investigation!...she just kept on saying rasika that i know my husband is not worng...if rasika was so good in her last job & if her boss was so happy with her then why she left that job? why no one is raising this question? why no one here tries to check the phone call list?...

about saanchi...i have no words to say! CVs r too unfair to show such meaningless and regressive track...it would be better if saanchi would have never changed!...

Quote

rohini55

@rohini55

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#22

Originally posted by: monamie111
@TM...great post and i agree with u!...

i am not sure what the cctv case u r discussing here...i think i have missed something..is the cctv camera is missing from shiv's office? shiv's offie had cctv cameras? 😕

anandi's investigation also not like an investigation!...she just kept on saying rasika that i know my husband is not worng...if rasika was so good in her last job & if her boss was so happy with her then why she left that job? why no one is raising this question? why no one here tries to check the phone call list?...

about saanchi...i have no words to say! CVs r too unfair to show such meaningless and regressive track...it would be better if saanchi would have never changed!...

Exactly. The police should have checked Rasika's phone record and that would have shown too many calls to and from Brajesh Sanghvi.

Of course they know each and so can talk to each oher, but it is a lead they can work on.

It is supposed to be a given in crime that criminals are not seen together. Here they are not only seen together, they call each other all the time.

CCTV: There has been a spoiler that the lawyer raises the issue of missing cctv from Shiv's room during court hearings.

Naturally this raises the question: if there was a CCTV why did Shiv not use it to prove his innocence? Why did he wait until it went missing?

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Missesha

@Missesha

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#23

To me, the most alarming question is: If Narendra wanted to commit suicide, why did he run towards Shiv's office?

If his reason to commit suicide (as provided by Rasika) was injustice done to his wife, then how and where did Rasika find out about Narendra's feelings of committing suicide.

Did N take this decision at home, on road, in bike, taxi, car etc. and at what point did he start burning himself?

How did he get the can of kerosene, and when he was burning himself, what exactly was Rasika doing? Waiting and watching or calling police, doctor, fire-brigade etc? What was her contribution in stopping Narendra from commiting suicide.

In case she joined him after he had lit the fire on himslef, then how did she come to know about his situation and intention?

And again, why was N running to DC's office?

Not a very difficult case to crack. If Narendra's suicide gets proved as a murder, investigation should be made to find the murderer. The other half of the story will unfold itself.

Anyways, we can only think. CVs will show what they have to. Hope they will not disappoint us.

No comments on Saanchi's story. Very awful story to watch. I was happy to see her when she faced media. I liked her start with Vivek and was hoping to see something sensible. But Saurabh's entry has made it worse and intolerable. Also why is there no Parole officer to check on Saurabh.

I thought criminals released on Parole, have to remain in a certian code and cannot be left alone. So how long will they torture us with this horrible story line, where a criminal can come back and torture the victim without being watched by anyone?

Quote

731627

Suspended

Posted: 11 years ago

#24

first anandi should tell kabra that rasika use to work with brijesh and should tell what brijesh think about rasika then kabra should ask rasika why u left brijesh job and join shiv office . kabra should ask shiv at what time u c narendra burning and should note time of death of narendra then kabra should ask rasika before narendra death why u call brijesh .. why is to so important to call brijesh and kabra should ask if narendra want to do sucide he can do sucide at home .what is need of narendra first going shiv office and then doing sucide

another thing vivek should ask anandi at what time u reach brijesh office and then vivek should ask rasika when anandi was in brijesh office why u try to call brijesh and vivek should also ask brijesh when anandi went away from ur office why u call rasika

and i hope there is some photographs of rasika and brijesh

Edited by surabhi01 - 11 years ago

Quote

Monamie

@monamie111

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

#25

CVs think that we viewers r dumb...so they never go in logical way but they choose dramatically illogical ending of every track!!

i don want to see any other person to redeem in BV as after redemption all of them act so stupid!

Quote

731627

Suspended

Posted: 11 years ago

#26

and i hope post mortem proove there was injury on back side of head of narendra before narendra burn .viivek should raise this point that someone badly hit on narendra head that means narendra was fainted before narendra go to office and narendra is fainted which means it is impossible for narendra to reach shiv office by himself that means somebody brought narendra to office

Quote

Awfulggt

@Awfulggt

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#27

Sanchi's track is a pain to watch or to even read in the written update. It has absolutely zero sense in it. Sanchi had no reason to tolerate such crap and these kind of acts leave dangerous messages.

Though I liked the way Shiv's case took an interesting turn when Naren was murdered, to speak the truth, I never liked the beginning of this track. The base of the case is itself not strong. Actually it seems like plain bull crap to me. A woman makes an entry, tries to seduce the hero inspite of having a boyfriend plus a husband. Like as if two men aren't enough for her😳. And she goes to the extent of killing her husband that openly...her boyfriend , as IAS😳 is an accomplice in this? All seem extra-ordinarily stupid to me. I seriously hope Rasika and that guy have a strong reason to do all this.And this CCTV thing is just another part of all this crap. Apart from all this Anandi keeps aplogizing to DB every now and then. Why? Has she gone nuts?

Coming to this Jester track, why did J not even consider Ganga's words? That looked totally illogical to me. He need not go by her words blindly, but could atleast check what went wrong?

Edited by The_Alchemist. - 11 years ago

Quote

Awfulggt

@Awfulggt

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#28

Originally posted by: monamie111
CVs think that we viewers r dumb...so they never go in logical way but they choose dramatically illogical ending of every track!!

i don want to see any other person to redeem in BV as after redemption all of them act so stupid!

I used to think so too. But now I actually think it is a capability issue. They are not capable enough to handle tracks logically, I believe.

Quote

rohini55

@rohini55

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#29

@Alchemist

CVs have a simple equation. Goodness=dumb. All good people are brain dead. And you can see this from the redemption tracks.

Both Jagya and Saanchi had brains enough to plan and plot while they were bad. Redemption over, and hey presto, the same people become extraordinarily dumb.

Shiv was always good. But there was a rakish edge to him before he married Anandi. That's how he caught out Heth Singh when he tried to trap him for bribery.

Post marriage, he's become dumb in direct proportion to his goodness.

Quote

swathimanjula69

@swathimanjula69

Explorer

Posted: 11 years ago

#30

Attacking of Sanchi by Saurab is quite normal thing. I mean person who doesn't have any ethics and policies in life will never value family values and relationships either. Even if he has not done the crime Rape will be quite ready to do this even if the prey is his elder sister in law whom generally given the position of Mother in cultured families. I think Rakhee will strongly protest against this nasty game of Saurab and his low valued parents. Its really surprising only elder and youngest got values and ethics in life. there must be some hidden secret binding with Saurab.

Quote

1 2 3 4 5

Two unacceptable developments - Page 3

Related Topics

Explore Topics