Posted:
I think CVs are trying too hard to make Sanchi a vamp and put a negative light on whatever she does.
Her irritation at Anandi and problems dealing with divided attention of parents and brother in family were understandable.
But the so called attempts at making a triangle between her, Jagya and Ganga is not coming across well.
I don't think it is wrong or villainish to be possessive about the one you love.
Why only Sanchi? No woman would be okay with idea of her fiance going all out to meet or support another woman (that too one who is single!).
Pretense and drama to handle people. Isn't it something that all do? She loves Jagya. And talks sweet to his family. Is it necessary to show later scenes of her heaving a sigh of relief at success of her "drama"?
Everyone puts up a face in name of courtesy. Sanchi does not want anything from Singhs. And Jagya is not even married to someone else now. So what's this vamp issue?
Also, what according to CVs is "right"? People are immature in childhood. Immature in teen marriages. Immature in adolescence. And now immature and not marriage material even after age of post graduation?
There is problem with lack of education. There is problem even in properly educated people?
There is no connection between the three with whom they are trying to make some love triangle.
There are no social, moral, ethical, religious or legal angles in their story so to paint some one as a vamp and other one as an angel! (There were lot of implications in Jagya-Gauri-Anandi one. And even the Bhairon-Teepri-Sumitra one!)
Sanchi is not doing adultery in her connection with Jagya. She has not broken somebody's home (knowingly or unknowingly).
There is NO meat or food for thought in this story that they are trying to attempt!
It has no message to convey. No issue to take up.
There is nothing "too bad" or shocking happening from Sanchi's side.
It looks like a mere ploy to create some problem (read "story"!) for Anandi and keep Jagya in doldrums instead of easily settling his life.
Sanchi doesn't deserve much bashing. She does not elicit extreme responses. At best you can call her irritating or confused or short-sighted.
I don't understand why a girl would keep trying her best for a man who never reciprocated her advances. He is not interested.
It's unbelievable that educated and sensible parents like Shekhars agreed for marriage over a mere one-sided infatuation! They are also happy at few good changes in Sanchi. But are they so naive to not understand that few days of good behaviour don't mean that basic nature has changed? Even the lapses in Sanchi's drama don't ring a bell??
Ira now says "Hum ladkewale BHI hain". Didn't they think of this earlier and wonder if Singhs said a Yes to them due to this pressure only? 😲
Anandi is only coaching Sanchi to be ideal beendni or wondering at her occasional lapse in drama. Is she tubelight? Why not communicate to Bhairon or Shiv or CM and take wise persons' counsel?
My point was that this story is flimsy. It was something that would not have arisen or would have solved easily. It's something that is being dragged and forced for no reason.
They are not even making Jagya mahaan and sacrificing through this (given how they show him making sullen faces or running after Ganga to help her or see her off). Whereas Anandi was only made to think of Jagya, not run after him (except for drama ordered by Singhs which she obeyed).
So what's it all about? Drag-fest aimed at another 1000 episodes?
Her irritation at Anandi and problems dealing with divided attention of parents and brother in family were understandable.
But the so called attempts at making a triangle between her, Jagya and Ganga is not coming across well.
I don't think it is wrong or villainish to be possessive about the one you love.
Why only Sanchi? No woman would be okay with idea of her fiance going all out to meet or support another woman (that too one who is single!).
Pretense and drama to handle people. Isn't it something that all do? She loves Jagya. And talks sweet to his family. Is it necessary to show later scenes of her heaving a sigh of relief at success of her "drama"?
Everyone puts up a face in name of courtesy. Sanchi does not want anything from Singhs. And Jagya is not even married to someone else now. So what's this vamp issue?
Also, what according to CVs is "right"? People are immature in childhood. Immature in teen marriages. Immature in adolescence. And now immature and not marriage material even after age of post graduation?
There is problem with lack of education. There is problem even in properly educated people?
There is no connection between the three with whom they are trying to make some love triangle.
There are no social, moral, ethical, religious or legal angles in their story so to paint some one as a vamp and other one as an angel! (There were lot of implications in Jagya-Gauri-Anandi one. And even the Bhairon-Teepri-Sumitra one!)
Sanchi is not doing adultery in her connection with Jagya. She has not broken somebody's home (knowingly or unknowingly).
There is NO meat or food for thought in this story that they are trying to attempt!
It has no message to convey. No issue to take up.
There is nothing "too bad" or shocking happening from Sanchi's side.
It looks like a mere ploy to create some problem (read "story"!) for Anandi and keep Jagya in doldrums instead of easily settling his life.
Sanchi doesn't deserve much bashing. She does not elicit extreme responses. At best you can call her irritating or confused or short-sighted.
I don't understand why a girl would keep trying her best for a man who never reciprocated her advances. He is not interested.
It's unbelievable that educated and sensible parents like Shekhars agreed for marriage over a mere one-sided infatuation! They are also happy at few good changes in Sanchi. But are they so naive to not understand that few days of good behaviour don't mean that basic nature has changed? Even the lapses in Sanchi's drama don't ring a bell??
Ira now says "Hum ladkewale BHI hain". Didn't they think of this earlier and wonder if Singhs said a Yes to them due to this pressure only? 😲
Anandi is only coaching Sanchi to be ideal beendni or wondering at her occasional lapse in drama. Is she tubelight? Why not communicate to Bhairon or Shiv or CM and take wise persons' counsel?
My point was that this story is flimsy. It was something that would not have arisen or would have solved easily. It's something that is being dragged and forced for no reason.
They are not even making Jagya mahaan and sacrificing through this (given how they show him making sullen faces or running after Ganga to help her or see her off). Whereas Anandi was only made to think of Jagya, not run after him (except for drama ordered by Singhs which she obeyed).
So what's it all about? Drag-fest aimed at another 1000 episodes?
