Now it is time to Move On For Sure - Page 4

Originally posted by: nniks

awww sangy *hugs* why do u even bother...u know this forum dosent deserve u...so dont waste ur energies...let them be happy over dead ansh n celebrate their mutilation...u knw we r so stubborn tht we cant accept substandard peoducts...so forget this BV and its forum :-D
besides now its a toral apprereciation forum so wats the use...
come to mastikhor club;-)

Originally posted by: Siya_

Koi shaq? 😆

Shall I start counting to ten again...last time before I finished the thread was closed🤣 Our dear Mods are the best politicians on this forum -" Do what we tell you to do otherwise stay in your well."

And some people know what Mods going to do next...not surprising !

Edited by riya_ss9 - 12 years ago

Originally posted by: SiriuslySujal

I believe there is a definite conflict between the claim that this forum promotes freedom of speech and the concept of a no comparisons rule.

For instance, one of my favourite bands is a female-fronted symphonic metal outfit called Nightwish. I love the music they produced up until 2005, when they fired their lead singer in an extremely unceremonious way. There was drama, and people thought the band was pretty much over. However, the band persevered and, after a 2-year hunt, hired a singer who was the polar opposite of the original singer. 6 years on, she too has parted ways with the band, and they have been using a fairly famous temporary stand-in singer in order to complete their world tour.

From the moment the second singer came in, everyone was comparing the two. Now, with a third singer in the mix, things are even crazier. Go to any Nightwish live video on YouTube, and the discussion will be about who is the best singer of the three. People have made 'duet' videos of songs by combining live versions sung by the different singers. There are a billion comparison videos and a billion arguments on the technical aspects of each singer's renditions of particular songs. And why on earth shouldn't there be? What's the worst thing that can happen if someone makes a comparison? Another person can take offence and argue back, there'll be a tiff, and both parties will move on with their lives afterwards. Freedom of discussion is healthy and should be encouraged. In the case of Nightwish, upon hearing singer 2 or singer 3 sing a song that was originally sung by singer 1, it is only natural for me to remember singer 1's rendition and talk about who I believe is better and why. Singers 2 and 3 are not stupid - they both knew upon signing up for the job that such comparisons were inevitable. I'm sure Toral knows this too. Why, then, does this forum seem to consider itself above such a basic and natural instinct? I'm sorry, but I just do not get it.

Originally posted by: Siya_

Nazneen meri haseen🤗😆

I couldn't agree with you more. There is no reason why the two cannot be compared as long as people keep the discussion civil - there is such a thing as debate, which I've heard is really healthy for pluralistic democracies. Also, this might not go so well, since imbeciles are not allowed to be intellectuals here and all, but still😆:

If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind. - John Stuart Mill

Also, aah, Nightwish!😃I've been in love with 'Wish You Were Here' for years - the only song I've heard though, and not sure who sang it.😛

Originally posted by: sweet_chilly

coudnt agree more...n i have always really liked JS Mills theory..totally apt in this situation...