kunta tai roxx!!!...super duper episode

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

deep153134

@deep153134

Explorer

Posted: 13 years ago

#31

I totally agree with the ego issues of Jagya... But i have to say all this is results of Gauri's ego issues too... I always had a strong feeling that Gauri is not able to forget her childhood issues ... The things that Gudiya faced... It was fulfilling that void and ego issues of hers which she had lost in childhood... She always had mental issues due to the traumas she faced..

The logical girl Gauri was lost the day she found out he is married and he is the same guy with whom she was married as a child... The Gauri we saw after was Gudiya trying to build her llife based upon the marriage of her childhood.

She hates Anandi as she feels that all the trauma she faced as a child was due to Anandi ... The Singh family accepted Anandi and rejected her.... The girl is not at all able to relate to the reality. The child in her is somewhere attempting to make the victory all hers this time... This is my opinion as i always felt her traumas are somwhere related to her behaviours,... Thats the reason they say, its very important to keep children away from any huge traumas while they are growing up

Quote

k_sarala

@k_sarala

Voyager

+ 4

Posted: 13 years ago

#32

It was a drooler epi. Kunda tai rocks. I liked yesday shivani blasting Gauri. I wish Gauri gets a realty bite now atleast.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Suchi-

@Suchi-

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#33

well said Deep and with her constant comparison saying,

should I take it as anandi's win,

or I do not want to loose.

these words indicate that , she is doing exactly that

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#34

Originally posted by: deep153134

I totally agree with the ego issues of Jagya... But i have to say all this is results of Gauri's ego issues too... I always had a strong feeling that Gauri is not able to forget her childhood issues ... The things that Gudiya faced... It was fulfilling that void and ego issues of hers which she had lost in childhood... She always had mental issues due to the traumas she faced..

The logical girl Gauri was lost the day she found out he is married and he is the same guy with whom she was married as a child... The Gauri we saw after was Gudiya trying to build her llife based upon the marriage of her childhood.

She hates Anandi as she feels that all the trauma she faced as a child was due to Anandi ... The Singh family accepted Anandi and rejected her.... The girl is not at all able to relate to the reality. The child in her is somewhere attempting to make the victory all hers this time... This is my opinion as i always felt her traumas are somwhere related to her behaviours,... Thats the reason they say, its very important to keep children away from any huge traumas while they are growing up

v. well said!! & i completely agree wid u!!!👏👏👏👏⭐️⭐️⭐️

@bold i always felt this abt G & even in many posts i'd pointed out this aspect of oders!!this is not from the day she came 2 know abt j's ruth but it was clear from that epi only wen once G'd gone 2 home & she accidently scattered that childhood bridal dress & jewellery & sindoor & then she started screaming & was badmouthing & blaming A 4 that childhood marriage breakage!!

@tinoo its not neecssary that all men who strays won't go back or find sum oder woman or go back 4 sum selfish reasons!! the men who find oder women if sum oder left him r not that common.i'd heard & seen so many cases where men strayed 4 once but wen oder woman left them & their wives rectify the way of their living styles men went back.most of the men or rather i say males of maximum fauna species r polgamous in nature.and most of the men stray bcoz of monotony of their married life esply after childbirths where generally women get busy wid children's upbringing & care & can't luk after their husabnds properly & even themselves. though its not their faults but males of most of the sps r like this & i m also not absolving males of their philandering nature.though i agree abt their polgamous nature but i also think that human beings r the only ones who'd not just developed their brain,body but also mind & conscience & soul & these r the virtues which make humans more knowledgeable & superior than oder flora & fauna sps. & thats the reason humans've created societies or social rules & ethics so that one human's action won't harm oder v.much. bcoz its only human beings who can do "karmas" & this is not even in the hands of gods or animals, birds etc. and due 2 their gud karmas humans can progress or regress while gods only can regress or attain the same position as 've earlier & animals etc. r not even capable of progress or regression .

and thats the reason which makes even G responsible 4 A's life though main responsibility is of J who'd made vows 2 A but as human & that 2 being a woman she've this responsibility.as if she shud b absolved of the blame of homebreaking just bcoz its her rt 2 choice or true luv or being a woman then being a woman she'd the responsibility 4 A's life also!!😊😊

Quote

stuti..

@stuti..

Inactive

Posted: 13 years ago

#35

Trying to understand counterpoint-as a debate,...premise being, third person is aware of existence of second person, yet very much involved and not disengaged (balvivah or no balvivah).

...But there is no justification in solely depending upon the assumed futility of a 'renewed marriage'. Even in case of actual futility, if it's insisted by one side only, injustice or the immense damage meted out to other side should not be overlooked, until two involved beforehand, mutually settle their disengagement. The entering third party has no right to judge or accomplice the nullification solely on bases of her partner's likes which is naturally amenable to her own leanings. She becomes partner and guilty of destruction/ immense hurt to second person. Her own willing participation may not have an oblique justification that the philanderer (or even actually shackled one) may go to woman#3, or if refused again then #4...#3 or #4 might have similar guilt proportioned (whenever acceding with above said knowledge) which is altogether different subject and may not be a cynical basis of justification for #2.

As for the guilt proportioned to the original renegade deserter or his reasons is different subject matter.

Edited by stutishah - 13 years ago