Mentor gone nuts? - Page 3

Tinno-the child does have rights to parents property,n shivani dint mean legality is nt at important ,she just told her dat her kid doesnt deserve the punishment,there is no fault of kid,watever she said was absolutely right,she has seen life,life,relations r much more imp then legality,ilegality.we run behind money,Money is imp but beyond money imp things exists right.

Gauri really only changed her mind to have the baby as soon as the mentor mentioned that her child can still get the property etc. Soon as she heard it the tears stopped and a big smile came on her face. Did she marry for love or Haveli status?

Even as the mentor heard Gauri's story you would definately pick fault with like why didn't she question Gauri about why she didn't finding out what the legal status of Jagya and Anandi's marriage before getting married? Why did you marry such a liar? The fact she didn't question it seemed like she really didn't really care and just said stuff to please Gauri. Mind you even if the mentor criticized Gauri's actions Gauri would think shes ganging up on her too. Problem is Gauri thinks shes always right if someone points out shes wrong she makes them an enemy.

Originally posted by: tanvismile

Tinno-the child does have rights to parents property,n shivani dint mean legality is nt at important ,she just told her dat her kid doesnt deserve the punishment,there is no fault of kid,watever she said was absolutely right,she has seen life,life,relations r much more imp then legality,ilegality.we run behind money,Money is imp but beyond money imp things exists right.

Tinno-if u check their conversation frm the begining,her main pain or tension was ilegitimate child,how wil she bring it in this world,shivani explained her dat child is child ,etc etc etc,yes she felt a relief dat injustice wont be done with her baby,now 2moro j leaves her,i m sure she wil earn n take care of her baby

Tanvi - I adore you - happy diwali! 😆😆

Originally posted by: doyelpakhi

@tiny15 - I am no legal expert but it's not so easy to disown one's children or heirs until and unless it is made official

If today, God forbid, both DS and Bhairon pass away, then automatically J or his son can claim- in fact, even if they disown J from property, his son can claim as an heir. even if the boy/girl can't get grandfather's or great-grandmother's property they have to give him/her the status of being one of the members of their family if it is proved in court

As you brought the topic of ancestral property, DS's property is Jagat's and his child's ancestral property...since DS has made it on her own, her brothers/sisters cannot claim on it ...but as far as her sons/grandsons/ great-grandsons are concerned they can claim if DS don't make a will and legally disown

i agree if sum1 passes away wid no will then proprty can b claimed by remaining ppl. but if DS & bhairon passes away then basant & his wife, bhairon's wife &daughte sugana & even anandi can claim but i don't think J or his child'll get it as they've disowned him.

as far as I know ancestor property can be claimed by legal son/daughter...so if JA have kids those kids can claim bt gaga kids can not...infact even gauri cant but anandi can..

I KNOWW

g-j child can claim its father s property whether self acquired or ancestral.although they have disowned j ,there is no document or wil suporting dat,today also j can claim the property of family since he is their waris,j although disowned has the right to property,family busines,wen it comes to his kids ,they have right to parents property.

J can't claim DS's property bcoz it was created by her & not ancestral.