There r a lot of talk ,which character is real one and which is unreal BV. But in my POV there is no any real character and there sd not be any real character in the serial, otherwise it wd be not a masala show but just a autobiography. The real situation r much different from the reel situation. In fact real situation r much more worse thn reel. If we see the real situation in BV context, it cd be much worse thn it is being shown. J cd dump A and cd live happily and Singh family cd kick out A from the family and she cd lead a miserable life. In other situation A cd file the case on J and there wd hv been legal fight between thm,
But is it necessary to show the real situation in the daily soap, which motive is entertainment and if together with entertainment they give a social messages, thn its like sone pe suhaga. In my POV, they mostly create the situation and show WHT SD BE in tht situation and not WHT IS IN REALITY. And this way they can give a social message. There r some serial exist which show the real situation and with real happening, but they r a different category, here I m talking abt the daily soaps.
Same whn we analyze a character we talk HOW IT SD HV BEHAVED in particular situation and not how people behave generally. Today its trend tht if a character is shown sacrificing, to criticize thm with tag of DEVI and whn other character is full of fault, praising thm with tag of PRACTICAL or REAL.
In BV context, I hv told in another thread too, to understand A we hv to understand the environment in which she is brought up. CVs hs shown a situation in which a child marriage is very common thing and where a girl hs to do all compromises and sacrifices. Where no one can raise a voice against the head of family, who is very conservative and dictator by nature. In tht situation if Anandi did compromise and all sacrifices to win the love and respect of family and sacrifices her own ambition to keep unity of family, is it fair to criticize her with DEVI TAG??? Living in city and talking abt woman rit and ambition is very easy, but here CVs hv tried to show even winning the respect and love of family is a big achievement and ultimate goal in tht situation.
On the other hand G is being praised tht she is very real character, becoz she hs all the real emotions. But can in reality anyone get marry in HURRY with a person, who hs been laying for more thn 5 yrs, without doing any enquires, and particularly if u r so well educated and modern?? Without caring his family and other wife and soon after marriage within few hrs, instead of SR, going for blessing??? And expect tht everybody is just waiting to hug thm . Can we say this is real character???? CVs hs created this situation only for entertainment purposes, so criticizing one as unreal and praising other as real is not fair. So in my POV, we sd analyze any character on the basis of moral ethic, and not on practicality, becoze no character in the serial r practical. This is the fact. We cant praise a criminal activity or adultery, or infidelity or insensitivity towards other character, by a character, only becoz in reality it happens.
Both A and J r unreal characters and created for the entertainment. One can like a character for entertainment value and dislike other, but whn its come to analyze a character we cant take these criteria. I, myself don't like only goody goody scenes, or boring tracks. Love birds tracks for long time can bore me either it's A&J or A&G, if there is not masala. I also started watching BV whn this G track started, and I liked tht character initially till she was in dark. I still love this track (if it will not be dragged too long), but it dosnt mean I sd justify G or J becoz they r entertaining me and criticize A, becoz she is not putting much masalas.
This is my personal POV and how I see the characters and write abt thm.